I use <a href="http://scr.im/" rel="nofollow">http://scr.im/</a> for this, and quite unlike something that advertises itself as a "condom for your email address," it has cute ladybugs instead.
Pretty cool idea. Was hoping it would instead spit out an obfuscated or dummy email address I could use on forms and signups which would proxy (perhaps for a limited time only) to my real email address.
Are spam filters really that bad? I've had my email address in plain sight for well over a decade - no munging or similar tricks, even using a mailto url - and my domain is a catchall. Spamassassin plus RBL works just fine for me.<p>My personal gmail is around 8 years old IIRC and similarly I really don't see any spam or false positives there either.<p>What are the people who are so concerned about this problem doing that results in them getting spam that isn't caught by filtering systems?
<i>"Removes the need for munging"</i><p>with a more complicated process. I've never found a "munged" email address hard to read. Also, how do they have to prove they're human? That would be good to see on the splash page.