TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

We built our startup out of hatred. Pure fury-fuelled hatred.

34 pointsby ldn_tech_exec1about 12 years ago

15 comments

jmdukeabout 12 years ago
The startup in question is here: <a href="https://www.getbrandid.com/#/" rel="nofollow">https://www.getbrandid.com/#/</a><p>And boy do I hate the copy:<p><i>SHOP. LIKE A MAN. Get someone else to do it.</i><p>Godspeed to these guys -- I agree that the mens' clothing space is definitely lacking -- but this seems like a bad alignment of marketing and target audience.
评论 #5532179 未加载
评论 #5532169 未加载
评论 #5532401 未加载
ArikBeabout 12 years ago
Some comments:<p>- When I click on "getbrandid.com" take me to getbrandid.com and not <a href="http://building.getbrandid.com/getbrandid-com/" rel="nofollow">http://building.getbrandid.com/getbrandid-com/</a> . There's no useful information on that page. I expect to be taken to your product. This is a major oversight.<p>- The all caps COMMENTS is bothering me, it's not that important of an element. Maybe it's just me.<p>- I can't reach the footer easily because of the tweets that keep loading. Seriously, what's the point of having a footer if I have to keep scrolling to get there?? There's a "load more" button but it keeps loading without clicking it (heck I'm not even able to click it).<p>- This URL structure: <a href="https://www.getbrandid.com/#/keep/calm/wearepros" rel="nofollow">https://www.getbrandid.com/#/keep/calm/wearepros</a><p>Is stupid. Semantics? Oh no! Additionally the back button doesn't work on that page.<p>A question:<p>Do the girls get paid a cut? I actually think this is a pretty nice concept. You're essentially paying an agent to do what they love to do (shopping) by letting another agent pay for the service to connect you to that agent. That's neat. And focusing this on men – at least in the early stage – is not stupid. I would reckon that most people who dislike shopping are men.* I'm not sure whether your brand positioning should be so explicit. Consider the income of the target audience and then consider whether they want to feel like they're being targeted by an offshoot of the Axe brand. I think you can find PLENTY of guys who don't need the whole "hurr durr I'm a man durr" and who would be willing to spend a lot more money having someone else buy this stuff for them. This way you may be missing out on those people and instead attracting less affluent/lower income males who are not the optimal target audience.<p>* I'm not one of them btw, men who dislike shopping that is.
stratosvoukelabout 12 years ago
I visited your web site and now I am a little full of hatred as well due to your record breaking stereotypical/conservative/sexist/gendered approach. I would like to know if there is a website that pays people (people of all gender identities) to choose clothes for you while it does not make you feel unwelcome due to the fact that you are not a "bro". (Why dont you make the girls choosing the clothes to have nude pictures as well, i am sure it would make the whole experience 12000% more manly!)
评论 #5532235 未加载
skrebbelabout 12 years ago
pure unadultered hatred of.... clothes shopping websites?<p>I may be too nerdy for this, but how can anyone have such passionate feelings about how some web shop doesn't make you feel manly enough? It all makes the whole story feel terribly insincere and immature.
评论 #5532138 未加载
fekbergabout 12 years ago
I like buying my own clothes and I don't feel like I'd use a service like this, not once, not ever. Does that make me less a man? I think not.<p>Your idea is sexist/stereotypical. Why not use your "innovation" and your will-power to create a shop that work for anyone at all, dispite the gender?<p>The site is also really confusing, feels like you've just thrown together some nice UI elements that a designer made for you. Did the funding for the UX/UI guy run out?
littlegiantcapabout 12 years ago
Not a bad idea. The design needs work. I can tell you right now that I'll never use your service though. I'm a pretty big bro, but honestly your entire tone is incredibly condescending. Just because I wear polos and was in a fraternity doesn't mean that I deserve to be talked to or treated like a child.
jawnsabout 12 years ago
I'd be really interested to know how difficult it was to get the rights to use all of the celebrity images on the site.<p>Or ... did you just gank them?
mrgreenfurabout 12 years ago
They keep saying they're not douchebags, but boy do they sound like them.
评论 #5532252 未加载
alan_cxabout 12 years ago
Erm, their "SWAT Team". Every single one of them a bit easy on the eye, no? Not exactly your "average" collection of people is it? Kinda fortunate, no? Too much of a dating site vibe if you ask me.
andyhmltnabout 12 years ago
I'm sorry for being off topic, but that blog navigation really annoys me.<p>I hate it when you click 'Home' on a blog and it doesn't take you to the main product page. But I thought this was different. I thought the 'getbrandid.com' would take me to getbrandid.com. Instead it took me to a page that pretty much just served as a link to 'getbrandid.com'
macca321about 12 years ago
I have a wife now, but without one I would probably use this service.
评论 #5532088 未加载
klepraabout 12 years ago
So if you don't hate shopping you are not a man?
artax77about 12 years ago
hoping an adult will come along and rewrite the copy for what is otherwise a good idea
helipadabout 12 years ago
Apropos of nothing, I went to Business School with one of the girls listed as a "specialist wardrobe augmentation technician". Lovely person.
评论 #5532155 未加载
MostAwesomeDudeabout 12 years ago
Amen! Too many people have forgotten what it's like to code in anger. It's an important ability to have.