TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Samsung claims 5G mobile data transmission breakthrough

31 pointsby dialsquare1886about 12 years ago

10 comments

Havocabout 12 years ago
We might as well drop the whole ?G classification. Since the US carriers started branding stuff 4G that wasn't anywhere close to spec its been a free for all.<p>Marketing aside, the tech might have merit in its own right though. I think the Ka band isn't available for use in my country though...
评论 #5699827 未加载
评论 #5699594 未加载
commiebobabout 12 years ago
In other news, 5G users can now burn through their data cap in under 10 seconds!
评论 #5699621 未加载
评论 #5699545 未加载
评论 #5699696 未加载
sp332about 12 years ago
I thought 28 GHz signals would be stopped by relatively small obstacles (thin walls). It's not a matter of detection; the signal is absorbed and there is none left to detect on the other side. How could they overcome this with an antenna array?<p>Edit: According to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka_band" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka_band</a> this band is used for satellite communications, but it very susceptible to attenuation in rain. So it's very cool that a new antenna tech could improve on satellite downlinks, but it still doesn't seem practical for a cell phone.
评论 #5700398 未加载
评论 #5700317 未加载
whyrusleepingabout 12 years ago
Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't 4G supposed to be 1Gbit/s?
评论 #5699558 未加载
pieterabout 12 years ago
All these faster speeds won't do anything really for heavily populated areas. The most important thing is total available bandwidth (bytes/sec/hz), and it's unclear how better that will get. LTE itself doesn't improve a lot over 3G techniques, the thing that's making LTE faster in saturated conditions right now is that there's just more bandwidth compared to 3G.
kallebooabout 12 years ago
&#62; "In my opinion 4G achieves a decent speed and what we need to do is crack the capacity crunch we are facing."<p>Translation: "The theoretical numbers we sold LTE with are a good target, maybe this technology lets us deliver that in the real world to all the users who want it."<p>From what I can tell, this technology isn't about making spectrum more efficient, but opening up new parts of the spectrum (10+GHz) that weren't usable before. edit: nice map of radio spectrum. Being able to use 28GHz seems like a massive leap. <a href="http://www.telecomcircle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Spectrum-Map.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.telecomcircle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Spec...</a><p>The short-term solution is to open up more spectrum to mobile use, but things are looking pretty congested. <a href="http://siliconangle.com/files/2011/03/spectrum_map1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://siliconangle.com/files/2011/03/spectrum_map1.jpg</a>
soperjabout 12 years ago
But I thought Samsung didn't innovate?
评论 #5700512 未加载
mmahemoffabout 12 years ago
Reminds me of the 5-blade razor story, from parody to reality.<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/2005/09/14/gillettes-5blade-raz.html" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/2005/09/14/gillettes-5blade-raz.html</a>
gcb0about 12 years ago
I honestly have a hard time wanting more than 3G at any time.<p>if anything, i'd like better latency and coverage.
评论 #5700832 未加载
jlarssonabout 12 years ago
Ericsson did an LTE-Advanced demo reaching around 950Mbps from a moving van almost 2 years ago ...