TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Europe funds secure operating system research

10 pointsby luckystrikeabout 16 years ago

5 comments

asciilifeformabout 16 years ago
Reminds me of this:<p><a href="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-navrozov-moments.html" rel="nofollow">http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-navr...</a><p><i>The lily needed no gilding at all, and it certainly did not need to be nanofabricated from isotopically pure, individually selected gold atoms. Academic CS researchers at the time, for whatever ridiculous reason (probably something to do with microkernels), thought that there should be many more fine-grained security transitions in an OS environment. In fact if anything the trend is away from multiuser computing and toward virtualized or "shared-nothing" designs in which communication between protection domains is minimal.</i>
tptacekabout 16 years ago
Research needs to go into secure programming environments, not secure operating systems. The vast majority of horrible security flaws never come within a mile of the kernel.
评论 #583517 未加载
emsysmanabout 16 years ago
This title says that funding is for secure operating system research. Contents seems like its for making minix better. I am very skeptical about operating system that fixes its bugs. It may become one more multics project. Though micro kernel looks really good in theory, neither minix nor hurd have taken off like linux or FreeBSD
评论 #583218 未加载
Agent101about 16 years ago
Research needs to be done into better operating systems, but I don't think it is worth implementing too much of them.<p>Minix, from what I have read, isn't going to be a sufficient enough advance to get the man on the street to adopt it. For that to be true it would have to significantly easier to manage. While he advocates the principle of least authority, he isn't currently innovating on how that authority gets passed on to the programs. A lack of mechanism generally means it is up to the user to do so, which puts some work load and cognitive effort on the user.
gaiusabout 16 years ago
So that's €2.5 million for 5 people for 5 years. Assuming they already own computers, that's €100,000/year each, and they don't even need to produce anything at the end of it. Nice work if you can get it!<p>Remind me again why we're a member of the EU?