For those in SF, the San Francisco Hacker News (<a href="http://sfhackernews.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sfhackernews.com/</a>) group is putting together a panel called "How to prepare for a seed round."<p>More info here: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/events/563105847065967/?notif_t=plan_edited" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/events/563105847065967/?notif_t=pla...</a><p>eventbrite tickets here: <a href="http://sfhn-seedround.eventbrite.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sfhn-seedround.eventbrite.com/</a><p>We have Lili Balfour (Atelier advisors), Ash Fontana (AngelList), Hiten Shah (KissMetrics), Will Bunker (Match), Nathan Beckord (FounderSuite) on the panel ready to chat and help out anyone interested.<p>You should come out if you're a hacker/entrepreneur wanting to find out more about funding and meet great people!
Look, congrats to Spreedly for this raise, but we honestly need to stop writing articles this way and posting them to HN.<p>Titling something "How X did Y using tool Z" has a very clear implication: Y can be achieved (and so X is substitutable by anyone reading) as long as you use tool Z and follow the steps in the article.<p>But then you read the article and the key parts of WHY Spreedly succeeded in raising money is glossed over as an afterthought. So we're left with a puff piece about both Spreedly and Angelist but nothing really actionable for the average HN user.<p>Humblebragging about the accomplishment is fine, but don't coat it in a "How" type article, especially one with a sub-title of "A MUST READ FOR STARTUPS OUTSIDE THE VALLEY". It's not. "Angelist-featured firm raises 300K in 10 days" or "Spreedly closes 300K round through Angelist" would be much more accurate, and doesn't give the average user a false impression of how building a business or raising capital is done.