TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Poll: What chat service are you using for internal communication with your team?

24 pointsby macealmost 12 years ago
What chat service are you using for internal communication these days? If you're using something that is not an option, leave a comment.

39 comments

Glyptodonalmost 12 years ago
Internally hosted Jabber/XMPP. It's actually been one of our longer lasting decisions, so it was a probably a good choice.
olympusalmost 12 years ago
Microsoft Communicator. If you're in a big company that already uses MS Exchange for emails then it's a pretty easy integration. Probably not a great solution for small companies due to the cost.
评论 #5914213 未加载
评论 #5914268 未加载
dunhamalmost 12 years ago
Private Jabber/XMPP server.
treboralmost 12 years ago
We predominantly use our feet. Unless someone's snowed in, sick, or subcontracted (and not local) we just walk on over to their desk and talk. Or, hold an ad-hoc meeting. When someone's physically absent from the office, we have no standard policy (though Skype is common).
petercooperalmost 12 years ago
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;talkerapp.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;talkerapp.com&#x2F;</a> - to me it&#x27;s essentially Campfire but free<p>Skype is good too but be careful if you use it for IM. I frequently receive messages hours after the other person sent them, even if we&#x27;re both online. This is starting to make me not want to rely on it other than for voice&#x2F;video.
mam8ccalmost 12 years ago
Lync.<p>Pros:<p>-Outlook Integration<p>-Screen Sharing<p>-Decent UI<p>Cons:<p>-Literally the worst copy &amp; paste implementation I&#x27;ve ever seen.<p>-No third party chat protocol integration. (I want to integrate Facebook and Google&#x27;s Jabber).<p>Edit: Formatting.
评论 #5913915 未加载
lifeguardalmost 12 years ago
We used skype at my last shop and it was not very smooth. I prefer self-hosted jabber &#x2F; XMPP.
评论 #5913593 未加载
tallesalmost 12 years ago
My company uses Communicator. Not a big fan TBH.<p>A stupid configuration prepends an underscore to urls, preventing it to be clickable. Hate it.
usujasonalmost 12 years ago
At my last company we made heavy use of Yammer.
Roedoualmost 12 years ago
We use Google+ for loads of internal communication. It&#x27;s easy to restrict posts to our organization via Google Apps.<p>While I&#x27;ve not seen any use to adopt G+ in a public way, it&#x27;s been a phenomenal internal comms tool for async sharing, discussion and debate that isn&#x27;t critical enough to go on an everyone@ email list.
jacobwcarlsonalmost 12 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hall.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hall.com&#x2F;</a><p>Pros: integration with PT and Github rules; mobile client is better than decent.<p>Cons: transcripts&#x2F;history can be wonky; no way to add metadata to file uploads; native OS X client seems to randomly eat characters when typing.
tcarnellalmost 12 years ago
Why is &#x27;email&#x27; not an option? Which is by FAR the most commonly used internal communication system - although I do NOT recommend it!<p><a href="http://teamstinct.com/but-whats-wrong-with-email" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;teamstinct.com&#x2F;but-whats-wrong-with-email</a>
cap10morganalmost 12 years ago
Humbug: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;humbughq.com&#x2F;signup&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;humbughq.com&#x2F;signup&#x2F;</a><p>Still pretty new, and in closed beta. But it adds an interesting threading&#x2F;topic model onto the typically chaotic stream of most group chat apps.
zooalmost 12 years ago
Flowdock. Holy moly Flowdock is slow. Have to restart it a couple times every day. SO ANNOYING
mbillie1almost 12 years ago
Internally hosted Jabber&#x2F;XMPP for chat; Google Hangouts for cross-location meetings.
fractalcatalmost 12 years ago
Internal XMPP. Poor ejabberd isn&#x27;t handling our growth in traffic very well and gets oomkilled and&#x2F;or swaps itself to death with depressing regularity, so we&#x27;re trying prosody (over the protests of the internal-IRC faction).
muyuualmost 12 years ago
VoIP, email and very occasionally an internal messenger. The idea is not interrupting others too lightly, since we already have scheduled meetings. If something needs dealing with urgently, then these measures kick in.
vollmondalmost 12 years ago
Phones... and long, agenda-less, ad-hoc meetings.<p>And sometimes XMPP.
评论 #5917102 未加载
chagelalmost 12 years ago
Dont believe there is no QQ :D <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;im.qq.com&#x2F;online&#x2F;index.shtml" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;im.qq.com&#x2F;online&#x2F;index.shtml</a>
bjhoops1almost 12 years ago
I had to choose Lotus Sametime. Now I must go weep alone.
eitallyalmost 12 years ago
Gtalk&#x2F;Hangouts, a little Skype still, and Whatsapp (although I&#x27;m forcibly trying to replace Whatsapp with Hangouts).
marknutteralmost 12 years ago
We use the product we&#x27;re working on: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kona.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kona.com</a>
dekzalmost 12 years ago
IRC with about 5 users, the rest just drop in at any time and expect every detail of the discussion to be remembered.
couringtonalmost 12 years ago
Now using Kato.im a lot and loving it. Have used Google, Campfire, HipChat, Flowdock in the past.
bowmanbalmost 12 years ago
Flowdock for chat and a GH&#x2F;Jenkins&#x2F;Jira feed. Google Hangouts for meetings.
btiplingalmost 12 years ago
I hope selecting two options was ok. We use a combination of IRC and Google Hangouts.
评论 #5914068 未加载
ismaelcalmost 12 years ago
At Mashape, we use Flowdock
gourneaualmost 12 years ago
We love Jabber. ejabberd is surprisingly simple to setup and get going.
aroemersalmost 12 years ago
Flowdock, it&#x27;s great.
评论 #5914028 未加载
silasbalmost 12 years ago
We use Google Talk.<p>My setup is LimeChat -&gt; Bitlbee -&gt; GTalk.
tcarnellalmost 12 years ago
Teamtinct.com - It is still in its early days, but works great.
c0nsumeralmost 12 years ago
Cisco WebEx Connect
chrismelleralmost 12 years ago
AIM. It&#x27;s so old, the NSA forgot about it.
positr0nalmost 12 years ago
IBM&#x27;s SameTime (part of Lotus Notes).
评论 #5913835 未加载
aantixalmost 12 years ago
Anybody using Sococo? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sococo.com&#x2F;home" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sococo.com&#x2F;home</a>
the_economistalmost 12 years ago
We use AIM.
grumpsalmost 12 years ago
SneakerNet and XMPP
sambeaualmost 12 years ago
Email
tomwhipplealmost 12 years ago
kato.im
评论 #5914087 未加载