TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Netbooks 2.0, with ARM processors

13 pointsby dragonquestabout 16 years ago

6 comments

Anon84about 16 years ago
On the other hand, Apple already has a lot of experience with ARM processors. Add a 10" iPhone like multi touch screen and you're one your way.
SwellJoeabout 16 years ago
<i>Although the software giant declined to comment when asked if it is planning an operating system for the new netbooks, analysts say it could easily enter the market if it chose.</i><p>Analysts are idiots. Microsoft could bring Windows Mobile (the mobile OS that pretty much everyone, including Windows fans, agrees sucks) to Atom "easily". But could it bring Vista or Windows 7 or even XP? Probably not easily, and probably not cheaply enough for Microsoft to consider it worth doing, since it would cannibalize their higher margin full laptop and desktop license sales. Linux, on the other hand, can be on these devices easily, in the form of Android, or one of the netbook targeted full-featured distros. The innovator's dilemma strikes again.
jeffespabout 16 years ago
I don't believe this is going to be a game changer for two reasons.<p>The first one is that the processor can't be that much of the total cost of a system. So these aren't going to be that much cheaper than a regular netbook unless they have a radical new form factor. If there is a new form factor, then it isn't really a netbook, is it?<p>The second is that it's all about software. Until we get to the point where everything is online, backward compatibility is still going to be very important and there are many things that people use that only run on windows. Or at least only on x86.
评论 #592388 未加载
评论 #592372 未加载
评论 #592354 未加载
mitjakabout 16 years ago
Hackintosh that fits in my <i>murse</i>. Sweet!
shoabout 16 years ago
I cannot believe anyone listens to a word Rob Enderle says after the SCO debacle. It irks me that he appears to have suffered no professsional consequences for his idiotic, misinformed pronouncements then - maybe we should have some kind of Ethical Pundit's Association for him to be drummed out of. I'd put a monkey throwing darts at a dartboard above his opportunistic nonsense.<p>However, the monkey does score occasionally, and by pure random chance I agree this time. When we're talking a sub-$500 device, taking off another hundred or so makes a huge difference. Current netbooks are nice toys but still too expensive; they are basically being bought as mini-laptops. A true "netbook" for $250 or so would be disruptive, I agree. That's the kind of price where the cell networks can start subsidizing the price and we enter a cellphone-style market, not a buget laptop market. Could be a big deal.
TweedHeadsabout 16 years ago
I wonder if Ubuntu Netbook will run on ARMs<p><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook</a>
评论 #592317 未加载
评论 #592377 未加载