TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Hosting performance / Hosting convenience

18 pointsby franklaemmeralmost 12 years ago

5 comments

mashmac2almost 12 years ago
Everyone&#x27;s Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis weights requirements differently, and convenience is a powerful requirement for many people. Performance is for others.<p>Say what you will about how awful shared hosting is, but the one-click installer of Wordpress et al has proven that a market exists where people are happy to pay to host things in the most convenient manner possible. Of course, in a more technical community, performance is part of a factor.
incisionalmost 12 years ago
In my experience, pride plays heavily into the devaluing of convenience. For every abstraction and or simplification there are people who put it somewhere on a scale from wasteful to cheating.<p>You don&#x27;t even have to dig very far into these discussions to find the guys who don&#x27;t abide hosting at all. They can&#x27;t fathom why everyone doesn&#x27;t build their own bespoke hardware and string together their own orchestration.
评论 #6019918 未加载
nasalgoatalmost 12 years ago
This post sounds like an excuse for poor performance in favour of convenience.<p>The better question is, why can&#x27;t you have both?
workhere-ioalmost 12 years ago
The problem with AWS is that it&#x27;s neither fast <i>nor</i> particularly convenient or user-friendly.
评论 #6019899 未加载
评论 #6019813 未加载
stephenralmost 12 years ago
So it&#x27;s hosted on AWS, which you admit rules out performance. It&#x27;s shared, and has heavy arbitrary limits on resource usage, so that rules out convenience.