TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

“Scientific Discovery Is Not Valuable Unless It Has Commercial Value.”

5 pointsby mikecanealmost 12 years ago

3 comments

schrodingersCatalmost 12 years ago
DNA, quantum theory, and yes quite a few early vaccines were developed without any commercial goal in mind. Some of the biggest scientific discoveries were done purely for the sake of discovery (i.e. basic science). This mentality is toxic and will tank innovation in this country. This is not isolated to the NRC. If you look at how the NIH (the biggest source of research funding in the US) has changed their mission in the past few years, you will see that translational science is being emphasized. Short term this will definitely lead to more cures (the e.bola vaccine and HIV vaccines are the best examples), but long term this will have the effect of stunting basic life science research. Don't think its a big deal? Ask why the NIH is now funding 0 basic science PhD students. That's right not a reduction, zero basic science pre-doctoral fellowships. I'm really glad someone posted this article
评论 #6019673 未加载
评论 #6019518 未加载
scotty79almost 12 years ago
Commercial value is not valuable unless it's used to make a scientiic discovery.
beauzeroalmost 12 years ago
Well throw the Polio vaccine out then.