TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

N.S.A. Imposes Rules to Protect Secret Data Stored on Its Networks

22 pointsby clicksalmost 12 years ago

5 comments

ChuckMcMalmost 12 years ago
From the article:<p><i>&quot;&#x27;[The new rules] makes our job more difficult,&#x27; Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the head of the N.S.A. and the commander of the military’s Cyber Command, told the Aspen Security Forum, an annual meeting on security issues. &quot;</i><p>If nothing else this is an excellent demonstration of how leaking information makes it harder to maintain conspiracies.
swombatalmost 12 years ago
<i>“When the president first came on board, we had a huge set of mistakes that we were working through in 2009,” he told the audience. “He said essentially, ‘I can see the value of these, but how do we ensure that we get these within compliance and that everything is exactly right?’ ” That suggested that Mr. Obama had questioned the execution of a program he had inherited from President George W. Bush, but satisfied himself by having the N.S.A. set up what the general called a “directorate of compliance,” an internal watchdog group.</i><p>So back in 2009 they were breaking the law in a myriad ways. Now, they&#x27;re breaking the law in fewer ways. In the meantime, two things happened:<p>1) They set up an &quot;internal watchdog&quot; (the effectiveness of that is secret and disputable)<p>2) They came up with secret laws to make the stuff they were doing anyway legal.<p>Which of those two do you think had the biggest effect on reducing the amount of illegal stuff they were doing?<p>I continue to think that government departments that commit crimes should be eliminated by either the judiciary or the legislative branch, illico. There can be no excuse for widespread criminality in government.
评论 #6068856 未加载
belochalmost 12 years ago
Cyberforces: Cheap.<p>Appropriate Judicial Oversight: Too freakin&#x27; expensive! Let&#x27;s just change the law so we don&#x27;t need it.
noir_lordalmost 12 years ago
Can I suggest they rename this - Operation Stable Door.
aspensmonsteralmost 12 years ago
&gt;Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the head of the N.S.A. and the commander of the military’s <i>Cyber</i> Command<p>&gt;Pentagon’s first units devoted to conducting <i>cyber</i>offense and -defense operations<p>&gt;The description of the Pentagon’s new <i>cyber</i>teams<p>&gt;The administration recently conceded that it was developing <i>cyber</i>weapons.<p>&gt;Future operations run by <i>Cyber</i> Command<p>&gt;for now the <i>cyber</i>force will be drawn from members of the armed services.<p>&gt;The <i>cyber</i>forces are inexpensive<p>&gt;other nations that are justifying the creation of their own <i>cyber</i>units<p>&gt;Iran has created its own <i>cyber</i>corps<p>&#x2F;twitch<p>The amount of <i>cyber</i> in this article is TOO DAMN HIGH.
评论 #6068852 未加载