I don't know, pretty much the standard wisdom you soak up after being on HN for a while. You can see that because many of the points are contrasted in an earlier post on HN "Why instagram gets VC and hyperloop not" or something like that.<p>The real question is: Why on earth would I want to go through an accelerator if I can check all of these points??
If you have traction, and revenue, then cloud computing and the right architecture is all you need in a 100% tech startup.
Great insights into their process but I'm wondering why you would be interested in seed funding if you already have a live product with traction and revenue.<p>It sounds more like traditional investing rather than venture capital.