Wow, is that a dumb idea. This might be a good time to re-read hurricane expert Chris Landsea's 2005 resignation letter from the IPCC:<p><a href="http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/science_policy_general/000318chris_landsea_leaves.html" rel="nofollow">http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/science_policy...</a><p>Quote: "It is beyond me why my colleagues would utilize the media to push an unsupported agenda that recent hurricane activity has been due to global warming."
Without getting into the dogma of this discussion is this going to change the minds of these people? I could see this becoming a "badge" of sorts for the deniers.
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/08/26/group-wants-hurricanes-named-after-politicians-who-deny-climate-change/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/...</a><p>Will hurricane "Jim" really make people think about Senator Inhofe? I don't think so.