Non sequitur to follow.<p>There is a French band called Stupeflip. Briefly, I believed this was going to be about them: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdaAHMztNVE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdaAHMztNVE</a>
Congrats on the launch.<p>I'm the founder of a photo/video service and aside from some initial up front investment in processing of photos (done entirely by us) and videos (mostly done by AWS) the vast majority of time is building the features around the already processed media.<p>I think this could be useful for a service which isn't <i>that</i> interested in the media itself but wants to put together something pretty quickly. But if the media is your livelihood I don't see it as such a fit.<p>Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought based on the video that I would have been a target customer.
I used Stupeflix for a project (needed the generate videos from set of pictures) and their API works really well. Simple, does the job, developer-friendly.
How is this different to <a href="http://animoto.com/" rel="nofollow">http://animoto.com/</a> other than adding somewhat more refined controls?