I didn't read beyond the first few sections of the post, but it wasn't really clear to me how it relates to postmodernism (ctl-f "modern" didn't turn anything up either). If you're interested in a paper attempting to actually relate postmodernism and programming, the best I've read can be found by querying your local search engine for [Notes on Postmodern Programming].
Is this article by any chance related to the pomo generator?[1]<p>[1] <a href="http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/</a>
seems as though it's as good a time as any to remind us all that programming has been post-modern for at least 11 years <a href="http://homepages.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~kjx/papers/nopp.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://homepages.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~kjx/papers/nopp.pdf</a>
ugh, postmodern in the title is link bait in one manner, nauseating in another.<p>If he had replaced "post modernism" with the term "post structuralism" he would have realised he should not write the piece from the get go.
i remember i read an article under the same title, that said more or less<p>that postmodern programming, is googling for code snippet to paste in your ide or framework<p>and all the effort you will do is configure and glue stuff together<p>sounded cool at the time