TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

In praise of micromanagement

10 pointsby mayutanaover 11 years ago

7 comments

buckbovaover 11 years ago
What this article describes is not micormanagement. It is more about company leaders imposing their will on the company&#x27;s products.<p>From my experience, this is false:<p>&quot;There is a natural limit to when micromanagement makes sense. Once a job, or a company, becomes too complex or too big, it becomes that much harder to gain the visibility and time you need to stay expert. This is a real danger zone for would-be micromanagers. You just don’t have enough time in the day, or energy in the belly, to keep up at the pace that is necessary. Either you embrace the principle of selective micromanagement, or you go down trying to do what cannot be done.&quot;<p>Of course there is no limit, just add another layer of management. They now micromanage their subordinates.<p>This is why there is a CTO, then a Software Director, then managers of different groups, and then technical leads. In my experience a completely flat structure doesn&#x27;t last.<p>Promotions are necessary to maintain talent and ensure employees are held accountable.<p>My feeling is the majority of company success is from top down leadership and vision.<p>A company needs a vision and goals and the employees need to own a piece of that success or failure.
integratonover 11 years ago
<i>&gt; One key: micromanagers must be experts.</i><p>Don&#x27;t forget that. If you aren&#x27;t an expert, cut that micromanagement nonsense out, step aside, and let the experts do their jobs.
评论 #6490861 未加载
mathattackover 11 years ago
Seems like it&#x27;s really about praising selective micromanagement: leaders going very deep into what they are very good at, and what&#x27;s more important, and letting others focus on the rest.
buckbovaover 11 years ago
Funny how this is a regurgitation of this similar article:<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-10-11/in-praise-of-micromanagers" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessweek.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2012-10-11&#x2F;in-praise-of...</a>
gregdover 11 years ago
Maybe we need to come up with a different word all together. I propose <i>macromanager</i><p>Micromanager has a negative connotation for good reason. Nobody wants to be micromanaged. Nobody wants someone managing the minutiae of their everyday jobs.
simonswords82over 11 years ago
Very annoying that because I live in the UK I can&#x27;t access this article :&#x2F;
评论 #6491634 未加载
beauzeroover 11 years ago
micromanagement != QA