<a href="http://www.sharedcount.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sharedcount.com/</a> has a couple less services, but much snappier results.
We created a script of our own that did this for the share buttons on <a href="http://viralsweep.com/advanced-sweepstakes-guide" rel="nofollow">http://viralsweep.com/advanced-sweepstakes-guide</a> and the main issue we had was that, depending on the service, you may have to specify whether it's www. or whether there is or is not a / at the end of the URL.<p>Services like Sharetally are neat because they do the crawling for you, but the numbers still may not be entire accurate; especially if you consider URL shorteners and how various services crawl and report those. Even more confusing is why some services (in particular, g+) seem to over-report the number of shares, only to self-correct later on (by as many as 10-11).
If I plug in a YouTube link will it also tally all of the YouTube link variations for that video? For example, if I put in <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wE3fmFTtP9g" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wE3fmFTtP9g</a>, will it also include the shortened <a href="http://youtu.be/wE3fmFTtP9g" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/wE3fmFTtP9g</a> in the tally?
Add bit.ly! Good stuff.<p>I've been doing this stuff for a bit on my personal sites. Interested in how different networks contribute to link popularity.<p><a href="http://hnfluence.com" rel="nofollow">http://hnfluence.com</a><p><a href="http://influentialtimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://influentialtimes.com</a>
Very cool! The Reddit results don't seem accurate after throwing in one of my sites that have been posted on Reddit a few times. The rest was interesting and enlightening. Thanks!