TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Libuv developer chided for making docs gender neutral

32 pointsby zaph0dover 11 years ago

6 comments

vezzy-fnordover 11 years ago
<p><pre><code> [*] arrogantly dismissed gender neutrality as &quot;trivial&quot; (#1015) [*] actively taken steps to revert positive gender neutrality change [*] chided @isaacs unnecessarily [] removed women entirely from the industry </code></pre> Ostensibly, reverting a pointless commit is one step away from removing women entirely from the tech industry.<p>Most shocking to me is how some people in the previous commit discussion genuinely believe that modifying two pronouns in code comments will somehow be a crucial step towards gender equality.
评论 #6823360 未加载
sjtgrahamover 11 years ago
Title should be: &quot;Libuv developer chided for allegedly merging commit without proper sign off&quot;<p>Post should be: buried.
评论 #6823349 未加载
评论 #6823369 未加载
geedewover 11 years ago
I don&#x27;t usually a comment about the things I know little; however this seems harmless enough.<p>It&#x27;s apparent to me there is a back story here and the guided reasons were not to demean women, but that&#x27;s certainly how I feel after rereading the comment in this commit.<p>It would be wise to not treat things like this lightly in public forums, no matter what the back story is.
glomphover 11 years ago
This is basically already being discussed here: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6821677" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6821677</a><p>Reverting is pretty weird.
Ettolrahcover 11 years ago
Some suggestions it was fraudulent over on @alex_gaynor&#x27;s twitter, but unsure if something like this can be faked.
static_typedover 11 years ago
1. However well intentioned, this sort of pedantry (the change from &#x27;him&#x27; to &#x27;them&#x27;) just alienates efforts to make things more inclusive, rather than actually helping .<p>2. Reverting the change appears to be fairly petty. By all means talk to the author of the commit about it, but commit tennis just makes the project look a little immature.<p>3. Is libuv really now at the point where it is 100% kitchen-sink-included-feature complete, mathematically and empirically tested bug proof, and with code so clean it brings a tear to a developer&#x27;s eye? If not, then why are you all wasting time on such petty commits, and not on actually, you know, improving the code base.<p>My boss always puts herself in frame as the &#x27;user&#x27; in her comments, documents and emails, so all examples are framed with &#x27;her&#x27; in mind. Does anyone mind? Does anyone start making changes to &#x27;them&#x27;? No, not really. I guess there are more important things to do.
评论 #6823468 未加载