This is pretty neat, the whole concept of 'open legal' is fascinating to me. For years it seems Lawyer's were like machinists of old, carrying around their own special sauce of document [1]. Now quality, vetted, legal documents are pretty straight forward to come by. This is pretty cool in my opinion.<p>[1] This was the root of a long running joke in Intolerable Cruelty referring to the 'Massey Prenup' -- <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138524/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138524/</a>
I have a question about the SAFE.<p>SAFE holders don't seem to have the right to veto dividends. Shouldn't they have that right? What stops a company from issuing SAFEs, making a big dividend, and letting the company's shell fold?
Chiming in to say that SAFE has been "ported" to France thanks to the awesome folks at TheFamily, it's called AIR: <a href="http://www.meetair.co/" rel="nofollow">http://www.meetair.co/</a>
Is "SAFE note" a valid way of referring to a SAFE security? If it's not a debt instrument, it seems weird to call it a "note." It almost sounds more like an equity option (i.e. investors are buying the right to buy a certain amount of equity at a set price in the future).