I am interested in how this product compares with Apptimize (a company that happens to be backed by Y Combinator).<p><a href="http://apptimize.com/" rel="nofollow">http://apptimize.com/</a>
My question is how does a service like this not violate Apple's requirements?<p>Isn't this a super easy back door around the App Store? Just submit a nice, simple app to Apple and inject offending modifications via Taplytics.
Looks cool!<p>I have a somewhat related question for anyone who works on tools/frameworks (for iOS I guess)... is it a pain to deal with iOS versions, ARC/non-ARC, and anything else? I was reading the quick start guide here and I noticed it said iOS 6.0+, so I guess you just have to look at the market share and make a trade off as to how much you want to support?<p>I've personally only worked on apps themselves, but I've always wondered if the people making Flurry, Tapjoy, etc have to go through hell getting their framework to work for every combo of Xcode and iOS out there lol.
At my previous position we built our own A/B testing framework for iOS. There were a few hiccups, but overall it wasn't too complicated. One thing that was important for us was to be able to tie together stuff happening on the Web side of the product with tests running in the app. Curious if this is possible with Taplytics.<p>Despite the DIY solution being relatively straightforward, given that they have a free plan, this seems like a much better way to get started.
This is a great way to make your native mobile interface completely dynamic. Sure makes mobile A/B testing a whole lot easier. ‘No app store approvals’ is huge. This is cool. I'm a fan!