TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Over one billion searches were made on DuckDuckGo in 2013

186 pointsby orrsellaover 11 years ago

30 comments

thrownaway2424over 11 years ago
I choose to give people the benefit of the doubt regarding their own points of view, so I am forced to consider the idea that &quot;Duck Duck Go is a good search engine&quot; is a true fact to some people. That forces me to consider how this can possibly be true. I find it&#x27;s not true for me because of all the ways I typically use Google, DDG does almost none of them. DDG doesn&#x27;t have local results (search &quot;Chinese&quot; on Google and then on DDG). DDG doesn&#x27;t have recent news (search &quot;Earthquake&quot; on Google and then on DDG). DDG does not have the coverage to answer a narrow technical question like &quot;does a c++ derived class need to define its own destructor&quot; (answer nowhere to be found on DDG; perfectly relevant stack overflow result is #1 on Google). What DDG <i>does</i> have is plain old search results, albeit not with Google&#x27;s quality and, of course, without any personalized input.<p>So for those of you who find DDG&#x27;s generically mediocre retrievals sufficient, I am interested to know what you use for my other cases. When you want to eat Chinese food, do you always use Yelp? What do you use for recent event news?
评论 #7042946 未加载
评论 #7042296 未加载
评论 #7042217 未加载
评论 #7041884 未加载
评论 #7041134 未加载
评论 #7042809 未加载
评论 #7042063 未加载
评论 #7041060 未加载
评论 #7041322 未加载
评论 #7041638 未加载
评论 #7041258 未加载
评论 #7041296 未加载
评论 #7042235 未加载
评论 #7042224 未加载
评论 #7042057 未加载
评论 #7041954 未加载
评论 #7041227 未加载
评论 #7042172 未加载
评论 #7041295 未加载
评论 #7041894 未加载
评论 #7042174 未加载
评论 #7042173 未加载
dredmorbiusover 11 years ago
I&#x27;ve been using DDG as my primary search engine since June, 2013. That&#x27;s not my first attempt to make a go of it, I took a couple of stabs at DDG over the past year or two, but found that the results were less than satisfactory: slow response, <i>no</i> response, and often, poor matches on queries.<p>With the Snowden revelations and the abundantly clear trend of Google to aggregate as much personally-identifiable information as possible, I made a clean break in June, 2013. The performance and search quality are <i>vastly</i> improved. And while I don&#x27;t eschew <i>all</i> Google products (though I&#x27;m making drastically less use of them, and as little as possible while authenticated), I find that using DDG as my first cut generally works.<p>For fallback, my usual scheme is DDG, !SP (StartPage, another proxying search aggregator making more full use of Google), and if I&#x27;m still not fully satisfied, Google itself.<p>There <i>are</i> areas in which Google&#x27;s search tools are still hugely superior:<p>⚫ Searching within a date range. DDG doesn&#x27;t offer this option.<p>⚫ Some specialized search, in particular Google Books and Google Scholar. Where Google focuses on its core competency of providing <i>search</i> and not on grabbing as much user data as possible, I find the company far more acceptable.<p>⚫ Some deep-site searches. Google seems to crawl sites more deeply and in more detail than DDG. I particularly rely on it for Reddit, whose own site search excludes comments.<p>As I&#x27;ve noted, Google&#x27;s biggest liability is that, no matter its best intentions, it cannot provide any guarantee against a government-size advanced persistent threat, especially not one with the law (constitutional or otherwise) at its disposal: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/1u356d/schmidt_my_biggest_mistake_is_still_not_realizing/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;dredmorbius&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1u356d&#x2F;schmidt_...</a><p>But overall, I&#x27;m hugely impressed with DDG.<p>For those who use console &#x2F; terminal browsers such as w3m or links, the &#x27;lite&#x27; version puts the &quot;search&quot; button one tab following the search dialog: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/lite" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;lite</a><p>And DDG&#x27;s TTY mode (command-line interface) is teh awesomenessedness:<p><a href="https://duckduckgo.com/tty/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;tty&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7040811 未加载
评论 #7040753 未加载
评论 #7040861 未加载
评论 #7041310 未加载
评论 #7041542 未加载
评论 #7040970 未加载
hnriotover 11 years ago
Don&#x27;t you mean &gt;1B searches were proxied to Bing, Google etc? Aside from being an anonymizing proxy, I don&#x27;t see any real reason for DDG. Maybe i&#x27;m wrong, maybe the news meant you served &gt; 1B searches from your own inverted index, but I didn&#x27;t see anything that suggested that.
评论 #7040777 未加载
评论 #7041003 未加载
评论 #7040669 未加载
Spittieover 11 years ago
And I&#x27;m happy to say that my searches where in this billion too :)<p>I still find myself looking at Google for some queries, but this seems to happen every day less and less.<p>Mostly local searches, as DDG is still very &quot;english-centric&quot;. I don&#x27;t know if they trying to &quot;fix&quot; this, but I sure hope so.<p>Overall I still find it an awesome search engine, thanks to the 0-click box, and the !bang syntax.
nathanbover 11 years ago
I have DDG as my default search engine both at home and work now.<p>As a command-line junkie, I like it that I can access everything in one place. Admittedly, maybe 1&#x2F;3 of my DDG &quot;searches&quot; are actually commands (I can type an address and then !map to go directly to the map for that address, for example, or a term and then !img to go to an image search for that term). I think of DDG more as a command line than a search engine.<p>The search results are generally pretty adequate, too. If you search for a simple term, you get relevant Wikipedia or IMDB results for that term, which is often exactly what I want.<p>And if I feel like Google would be more relevant, I can just slap a !g on there. I realize &quot;ease of access to a competitor&#x27;s product&quot; is not a fantastic selling point, but for me it&#x27;s enough.<p>100% personal preference, obviously, but it works for me.
blantonlover 11 years ago
I&#x27;m curious how this compares to the amount of searches on Google&#x27;s platform. 1 billion searches in 2013 sounds like a huge number, but placing that into context might be a better way to announce this.
评论 #7041265 未加载
PhasmaFelisover 11 years ago
One underappreciated advantage of DuckDuckGo is that it doesn&#x27;t censor results as Google does, which is really useful for finding, e.g., torrent sites.
评论 #7041210 未加载
评论 #7040822 未加载
评论 #7043727 未加载
oh_teh_meowsover 11 years ago
just to provide some perspective, a quick google search (oops) informed me that google sees 5.9 billion searches a day (about 2.16 trillion searches in 2013). Before the Snowden revelation, DDG enjoyed a slow but steady growth, getting around 50 mil queries a month, and rapidly increased to over 100+ mil after the leak.<p><a href="http://www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statisticbrain.com&#x2F;google-searches&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https://duckduckgo.com/traffic.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;traffic.html</a>
interstitialover 11 years ago
I was hoping for some snark, like: &quot;Top search trends on DuckDuckGo for 2013: We don&#x27;t know, we don&#x27;t track your searches!&quot;
评论 #7040577 未加载
评论 #7042574 未加载
a3_nmover 11 years ago
&quot;One billion&quot; sounds impressive but it should be compared to over two thousand billion searches made on Google Search over the same period: <a href="http://www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statisticbrain.com&#x2F;google-searches&#x2F;</a>
atmosxover 11 years ago
DuckDuckGo is a Good search Engine for English-speaking countries. I&#x27;m European (Greek) and whenever I need to search the Greek-web, which is quite often, I found DDG result&#x27;s lucking very <i>basic</i> staff.<p>To give you an example, say the government passed a new law (which happens every day), if I try searching at DuckDuckGo 9 out 10 I won&#x27;t find anything <i>closely related</i>. If I search Google the most prominent newspaper headlines (along with notorious news-sites) pop-up and I find what I need.<p>I know that Google closely monitors my clicks (I own a Chromebook and Chrome is my default browser everywhere) and shows me different results than other users. But thing is, for non-English content it&#x27;s too far ahead of the competition for the time being.
nazgulnarsilover 11 years ago
For anyone reading this who doesn&#x27;t know (because i didn&#x27;t until someone explained and linked me) bang notation is amazing. <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/bang.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;bang.html</a>
piratekingover 11 years ago
I have been using DDG as my starting point for all desktop searches since 2011. I use Safari as my main browser and use the hosts file method to set DDG as my default search[1]. I wish iOS had an option for similar.<p>Using DDG started off awkward, but the bang syntax is muscle memory now. I would say my breakdown of providers is as follows: !g: 50%, !w: 30%, !gi: 10%, !az: 5%, !yelp: 5%<p>I never use DDG directly.<p>[1] <a href="https://duck.co/help/desktop/hosts-file" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duck.co&#x2F;help&#x2F;desktop&#x2F;hosts-file</a>
评论 #7041694 未加载
anigbrowlover 11 years ago
1,000,000,000 &#x2F;365 = ~3m&#x2F;day; Alexa suggests 5.6 pageviews&#x2F;user so ~600k unique users.
评论 #7041689 未加载
jimmytideyover 11 years ago
I was looking a JS library I&#x27;d seen mentioned on here, and couldn&#x27;t find it with Duck Duck Go. Was about to start posting &#x2F; tweeting asking if anyone knew where it was, but thought I&#x27;d try Google first. This library came up first result. I&#x27;d have looked like a dick if I hadn&#x27;t tried Google first - &quot;Google is your Friend&quot; is powerfully socially enforced.<p>Now I use DDG mostly with the !g...
ilakshover 11 years ago
I&#x27;m pretty sure most DuckDuckGo searches go straight to Bing.
jeffbr13over 11 years ago
I&#x27;m just gonna say that by far the best features, for me, are the &quot;Goodies&quot; (had to look that up[1]) which let you query other services through the same interface.<p>For example, `!wa ...` will query Wolfram Alpha, `!m {location}` will give me a map, `!w ...` will search Wikipedia, and `!g ...` will redirect me to a google search if DDG&#x27;s results aren&#x27;t comprehensive enough.<p>For 90% of my queries, DuckDuckGo gives me exactly what I need, or enough data to drill down and make a more effective query. And, more importantly, <i></i>it provides a single interface to all other major search engines<i></i>, making it a hell of a start page to have[2].<p>[1]: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/goodies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;goodies</a> [2]: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7041710 未加载
_RPMover 11 years ago
Interesting fact: <a href="http://duck.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;duck.com</a> redirects to Google.com
评论 #7041526 未加载
buckbovaover 11 years ago
Switched to DuckDuckGo for searches from the desktop a year ago. Just to give someone else a chance.
评论 #7041595 未加载
navsover 11 years ago
I know this is a silly nitpick but I do wish DuckDuckGo had a simpler URL. It&#x27;s so quick and easy to type in bing, google and even blekko. How&#x27;s about some variation on DDG?<p>That aside, I especially love DDG&#x27;s Goodies: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/goodies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duckduckgo.com&#x2F;goodies</a><p>I use it for simple password generation, lorem ipsum text, color code conversion, etc. I know Google has its extras but I don&#x27;t believe it comes close to DDG&#x27;s goodies offering
评论 #7040886 未加载
评论 #7041096 未加载
drakaalover 11 years ago
We don&#x27;t track searches,at <a href="http://www.plexisearch.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.plexisearch.com&#x2F;</a><p>And we don&#x27;t have ads, so there is that too.<p>We want to make search better. Not out of the goodness of our heart, but because we figure if we do a good job someone will buy us, and then we will get paid, and the bad guys at Google or Bing will at least offer you better results when they are being creepy. That&#x27;s what it is all about right?<p>We are about 1% the size of DDG.
评论 #7041921 未加载
评论 #7043599 未加载
tiatiaover 11 years ago
I tried GGG but I prefer ixquick.com or startpage.com
unlimitover 11 years ago
I have been using DDG for sometime in my office, in fact DDG is my default in firefox. I don&#x27;t miss google. DDG finds me whatever I need.
Sir_Cmpwnover 11 years ago
Does anyone know the numbers from last year?
评论 #7040582 未加载
ozhover 11 years ago
Quick tip that&#x27;s cool with DDG: just type in the URL bar something like &quot;ddg.gg&#x2F;things you are looking for&quot; (providing that as soon as you type &quot;dd&quot; your browser will most likely auto expand it to &quot;ddg.gg&#x2F;&quot;, you need very few keystrokes)
josephlordover 11 years ago
I use it in Firefox on the computer and only occasionally use Google. I raised a bug with Apple to request the ability to set it on mobile Safari. At the moment you can only use Google or Bing (or Yahoo-Bing)<p>File duplicates if you want it as Apple counts dupes as up votes.
k-mcgradyover 11 years ago
I&#x27;d be interested to know what browser is most popular with DDG users. Are people who use it because of privacy concerns with Google still using Chrome? Or other Google products?
higherpurposeover 11 years ago
By the way for people who really care about privacy, there&#x27;s Epic Browser, which has some anti-tracking stuff built-in, and is based on Chromium:<p><a href="http://www.epicbrowser.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.epicbrowser.com&#x2F;</a><p>I wish they&#x27;d allow people to change the Omnibox search engine, though, or offer DDG and Startpage as options, especially if they can partner up with them and take a cut of revenue, but I guess it&#x27;s not a huge deal breaker.
评论 #7043675 未加载
seeingfurtherover 11 years ago
the best thing DDG could do is to simulate Google&#x27;s UI as much as possible without getting sued. Think about it.
评论 #7043016 未加载
linux_devilover 11 years ago
And I did hundreds of them.