TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Thorium-Fueled Automobile Engine Needs Refueling Once a Century

22 pointsby itomatikover 11 years ago

8 comments

Tloewaldover 11 years ago
Ridiculous puff piece. The key component for any of this is a working accelerator driven thorium reactor which we don&#x27;t have. Once we have such a thing, energy ceases to be scarce (at least by current standards). Such reactors are like fusion, except instead of being perpetually 25 years away they seem to be 10-15 years away.<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerator-driven_sub-critical_reactor" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Accelerator-driven_sub-critical...</a>
评论 #7046037 未加载
panziover 11 years ago
Thunderf00t explains why this is BS: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=568iDYn8pjc" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=568iDYn8pjc</a>
gus_massaover 11 years ago
I will just repeat my comment from an article about the same car two years ago ( <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2879219" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=2879219</a> ):<p>This is fake or a scam!<p>There are same interesting quotes in the original article: <a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wardsauto.com&#x2F;ar&#x2F;thorium_power_car_110811&#x2F;</a><p>First, this is not a nuclear reactor: (at the end of the article)<p>&gt; <i>This means no nuclear reaction occurs within the thorium. It remains in the same state and is not turned into uranium 233, which happens only if thorium is sufficiently super-heated to generate a fission reaction.</i><p>It says that thorium has a lot of energy, not that they can extract it: (in the middle of the article)<p>&gt; <i>Because thorium is so dense, similar to uranium, it stores considerable potential energy: 1 gm of thorium equals the energy of 7,500 gallons (28,391 L) of gasoline Stevens says.</i><p>And the explanation of how it works doesn&#x27;t make any sense: (at the beginning of the article)<p>&gt; <i>The key to the system developed by inventor Charles Stevens, CEO and chairman of Connecticut-based Laser Power Systems, is that when silvery metal thorium is heated by an external source, it becomes so dense its molecules give off considerable heat.</i><p>The entire story sounds very similar to the presentations of the perpetual moving machines, or the cold fusion: a promise of a lot of cheap energy, but not a working prototype that produce more energy that it consumes.
unmoleover 11 years ago
One look at the website for LPS and you know it&#x27;s pure BS: <a href="http://www.laserpowersystems.com/links/thorium-car/lps-car" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.laserpowersystems.com&#x2F;links&#x2F;thorium-car&#x2F;lps-car</a>
Ygg2over 11 years ago
What are security implications of Thorium fueled automobiles?<p>What if someone places an explosive device in it? Or two thorium fueled cars crash? What happens to reactor in these cases?<p>Is there mini Chernobyl everytime (let&#x27;s say food&#x2F;water is poisoned for a month or so) this car collides with something?<p>I think things like thorium fueled cars would be way more useful for inter solar travels than as cars (Less chances of causing environmental disaster).
xanthover 11 years ago
Nope not true; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=568iDYn8pjc" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=568iDYn8pjc</a>
daniyalnover 11 years ago
Seems unlikely... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=568iDYn8pjc" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=568iDYn8pjc</a>
kmfrkover 11 years ago
I am not a nuclear engineer, so can someone explain the safety risks in the event of a car accident?
评论 #7046018 未加载
评论 #7046034 未加载