TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Mercurial 2.9 released

78 pointsby 15DCFA8Fover 11 years ago

8 comments

sdfjklover 11 years ago
Very glad to see this in between all the git monoculture. Yes, GitHub is kind of nice for some things, but git really isn't.
评论 #7168479 未加载
philtarover 11 years ago
I rarely have geeky conversations with anyone (since I don&#x27;t know any and that is why I hang out here) but I&#x27;m genuinely curious:<p>Why is git more popular than hg? I tried both and hg was generally easier (for me) to pick up. I&#x27;m sure it&#x27;s not JUST because of github.
评论 #7168856 未加载
评论 #7168572 未加载
评论 #7168726 未加载
评论 #7169145 未加载
评论 #7168828 未加载
评论 #7169424 未加载
toggleover 11 years ago
The only bug here that was &quot;bugging&quot; me was that issue 3857, where you had to specify the username in your config rather than being able to just do it on the fly in the command. Nice to see the rest getting fixed, though.<p>While we&#x27;re talking about Mercurial (which is rare), the crecord extension may be getting Windows support soon -- there&#x27;s a Windows fork, and the original author wants to merge it in. Crecord is a command-line interface for choosing which specific lines to include in a commit. It&#x27;s one of the reasons why I feel hg is very useable from the command line, even if you aren&#x27;t a command-line wizard.<p>crecord: <a href="https://bitbucket.org/edgimar/crecord/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitbucket.org&#x2F;edgimar&#x2F;crecord&#x2F;</a><p>windows fork: <a href="https://bitbucket.org/jmb/crecord" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitbucket.org&#x2F;jmb&#x2F;crecord</a>
notwedtmover 11 years ago
I would be interested in hearing from people who are using hg still. What is the reasoning? Do you see something in hg that the rest of us don&#x27;t? Are there specific features of hg that git doesn&#x27;t have?
评论 #7168371 未加载
评论 #7168339 未加载
评论 #7168384 未加载
评论 #7168357 未加载
评论 #7168867 未加载
评论 #7168417 未加载
评论 #7168355 未加载
评论 #7168498 未加载
评论 #7169172 未加载
评论 #7169331 未加载
评论 #7168896 未加载
polarixover 11 years ago
I would LOVE to use mercurial. If the concept of a backup bundle was completely removed. When I amend a commit with git, I don&#x27;t put myself 20 minutes away from recovering that pre-amend commit. If hg comes up with some way to have a flat namespace like git, (ideally with a reflog) I&#x27;ll be back.
评论 #7169151 未加载
评论 #7168836 未加载
eperoumalover 11 years ago
For all the reasons mentionned in this thread (interface consistency, performance, ...) hg is far superior to git. But, as long as git would get the cool tools - namely, gitlab &#x2F; gitlab-ci - people won&#x27;t bother looking at hg. I started a new project with collaborators a month ago, we had to chose git mainly because of gitlab, as it would ease the process of managing consistently our codebase in a visual and simple way, not to mention the continuous integration goodness that comes with gitlab-ci. There is, to my knowledge, no close equivalent for hg.
评论 #7169573 未加载
jgalt212over 11 years ago
Has anyone used this (or something similar)?<p>the Hg-Git mercurial plugin<p><a href="http://hg-git.github.io/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hg-git.github.io&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7168895 未加载
评论 #7169245 未加载
评论 #7170379 未加载
评论 #7169627 未加载
pbreitover 11 years ago
The monthly updates always scare me a bit for version control. Is that really prudent?
评论 #7168497 未加载
评论 #7169370 未加载