> <i>There are just not enough women in the pipeline starting from as early as K-12 schools.</i><p>This is the statement that loses me. The author seems to state it as if it's a given. But who is deciding there "aren't enough"? What is this supposedly ideal number ("enough") based on? Serious question.
Not a direct article comment:<p>I'm asking this to anyone who supports the activist approach to the women in tech problem. a) If you had to put a number on it, what would you deem the percentage chance that this school of thought is actually wrong, and b) what are the consequences if it is?