TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The newest threat on the official Android market

110 pointsby ilhackernewsabout 11 years ago

8 comments

magic_hazeabout 11 years ago
XPrivacy should really come installed by default with Android: the new versions are really quite good (especially with the cloudsourcing and on-demand bits) and really highlight how atrocious most apps are with your personal data. And it is a hell of a lot more effective than relying on companies like Avast to detect and remove bad actors from the market. I've lost track of the number of times random apps (most of whom are just shells around a website) ask permissions for my full phone number, Google and Facebook accounts, contact info etc. for no reason at all. At this point, I'm scared of using Android without the module. (not that ios or windows are any better)
评论 #7370479 未加载
评论 #7369825 未加载
评论 #7370313 未加载
georgemcbayabout 11 years ago
Given how shady the whole premium SMS&#x2F;premium number business is to begin with, it should be made legally simple to refuse all payment on charges to them.<p>eg. Say you notice you suddenly owe $100 on your phone bill due to a phone app causing charges to your bill (or even just because you gullibly fell for a social engineering attack), you should be able to just refuse to pay with no repercussions other than that the premium provider will be sent a notification that you refused to pay and then may block you via caller id from future use of the service.<p>I doubt this will ever happen since politicians generally don&#x27;t give a rat&#x27;s ass about consumers anymore, but it would be nice.
评论 #7371365 未加载
amimeticabout 11 years ago
Bear in mind it is Avast writing this post (not exactly my favourite company at the moment, incorrectly reporting a trojan to a few users in one of my Apps), so the alarmist perspective is motivated by their business.<p>If the worst they can report on is an obscure and rather obviously dodgy looking App no longer on Google Play then there isn&#x27;t much for us to worry about.
Apocryphonabout 11 years ago
I thought KitKat was supposed to block apps from automatically sending SMS messages to premium numbers?<p>This is a nasty piece of malware, but premium SMS scam apps are nothing new to Android. So the article playing up the danger of this random, seemingly single-market focused malware (Hispanophone vs. global) isn&#x27;t particularly scary.
评论 #7369601 未加载
rjzzleepabout 11 years ago
at this point i&#x27;d like to recommend cyanogenmod with privacy guard again [1]<p>or openpdroid [2], or both. the cool thing about openpdroid is that you can spoof location requests too. also, i don&#x27;t think any other privacy app allows you to block requests to sim and imei info<p>[1] <a href="http://www.androidcentral.com/cyanogenmod-updating-privacy-guard-20-new-features-coming-cm102" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.androidcentral.com&#x2F;cyanogenmod-updating-privacy-g...</a><p>[2] <a href="http://www.xda-developers.com/android/openpdroid-brings-an-open-source-privacy-solution/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.xda-developers.com&#x2F;android&#x2F;openpdroid-brings-an-o...</a>
评论 #7370503 未加载
评论 #7370617 未加载
cgtyoderabout 11 years ago
Looks like it&#x27;s gone from Google Play.
cmelbyeabout 11 years ago
I&#x27;m surprised they went to those measures to get the user&#x27;s phone number, it seems like there would be much simpler and more inconspicuous ways to do so on Android.
jmnicolasabout 11 years ago
It&#x27;s a long time since I didn&#x27;t touch Java, I don&#x27;t get the instruction &quot;break label217;&quot;.<p>Is it equivalent to a &quot;goto label217&quot; ? (shock and horror !!!)
评论 #7371835 未加载