I couldn't help but laugh out loud at this line:<p>"General Fusion's basic approach isn't entirely new. It builds on work done during the 1980s by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, based on a concept called Linus."<p>On a more serious note, I wonder how they will deal with metal fatigue on the sphere being rammed by the pistons once every second. Not all of the energy of those compressions will be transferred into the fluid, that sounds like the reactor core might become a wear item.<p>Another question regarding this:<p>"likely because the technology to precisely control the speed and simultaneous triggering of the compressed-air pistons simply didn't exist two decades ago."<p>What is so critical about controlling compressed air pistons ? They move at a snails pace relative to electronics from the 70's, why is it that only now this would be possible based on controlling essentially very slow devices once-per-second ?<p>And wouldn't it be easier to do this using electromagnets attached to the outer shell at strategic spots ? <i>much</i> faster response time and higher frequencies possible, also much easier to synchronize than 220 pneumatic hammers striking a sphere. Is there really no other way to get the required wave pattern ?<p>What will happen to the fusion energy if one of the hammers would fail due to a seizure or seal failure of a single pneumatic ram (this is not a theoretical failure, it happens).
I get very excited about hearing of things like this ...even if there's a strong possibility of failure. In our lifetimes, a few of these efforts will lead to great things.<p>Michio Kaku described in 'Parallel Universes' the concept of 5 civilization stages (with respect to energy harnessing) and the concept that if we get past the next 50 to 100 years, well ...we might have an easier time of things.<p>Those who are willing to look under every stone get my well wishings.
Wandering if its one of many possibly dangerous start-ups. Few weeks ago i read about Copenhagen rocket science engineers, with great plans for future (moon landing was in their aims). What with bioengineering start-ups?<p>It's off topic, but do you know some of this groups? And what don't you think that freedom in such fields can jeopardise large population?