TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Pirahã defies Chomsky's theory of universal grammar

8 pointsby j2d2almost 16 years ago

2 comments

mglukhovskyalmost 16 years ago
Everett's claims have provoked a firestorm of debate. I was lucky enough to take a seminar with David Pesetsky from MIT shortly after Everett's story began appearing in the popular media, and he discussed what he perceived as serious flaws in Everett's findings and methodology. Nevins, Pesetsky, and Rodrigues have since published a lengthy and detailed rebuttal (<a href="http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000411" rel="nofollow">http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000411</a>) that shows that Piraha does in fact have recursion. In fact, the surprising thing about Piraha is how unremarkable it is. It shares traits with German, Hindi, Hebrew, and many more languages. Pesetsky, et. al. also believe that the argument that quantifiers do not exist is not supported by the facts. More details are in the paper.<p>As far as their culture is concerned, there is evidence from other anthropologists that the Piraha do indeed have creation myths (the rebuttal paper actually includes one on page 44).<p>People jump on stories like these because it makes for a good news story ("Rebel Linguist Takes Down Noam Chomsky"). But the evidence I've seen doesn't sound so convincing.
评论 #742363 未加载
评论 #741159 未加载
评论 #740867 未加载
gruseomalmost 16 years ago
A superb piece. I couldn't help reading the whole damn thing. The interplay between the scientific and human dramas is masterfully done. There are so many things I could say about this article that I'm not even going to try.<p>I didn't recognize the name John Colapinto, but it didn't take long to figure out that I've heard him before. He wrote a book about the infamous case of a boy who, after a botched circumcision as a baby, was forcibly raised like a girl to satisfy the pet gender theory of an unscrupulous psychologist. It was a tragic story. The boy grew up to courageously challenge the identity that had been imposed on him and lived as an adult male, but killed himself a few years after the book was published. I remember hearing a riveting interview with him and Colapinto on Fresh Air (<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1111038" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1111038</a>).<p>So that makes two great pieces by John Colapinto. I wonder what else I've missed.