TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

FiveThirtyEight’s NCAA Tournament Predictions

54 pointsby gmu3about 11 years ago

6 comments

digikataabout 11 years ago
What&#x27;s often quoted in Warren Buffet&#x27;s Billion dollar NCAA contest are the odds of randomly picking the perfect bracket of teams, but I have to think that Buffet&#x27;s insurance actuaries actually calculated the odds of randomly selecting the right bracket with a millions of random guesses around a locus of likely guesses informed by analysis like the posted page (and from other stats analysis professionals.. vegas oddsmakers for example...). Otherwise the risk of taking that bet is actually much higher than a fully random pick, yes?<p>Edit: As it turns out, Warren Buffet, as usual, seems to have done his homework and even adds the interesting angle of &quot;buying out&quot; a possible winner partway through the contest:<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2014/03/billion_dollar_bracket_challenge_why_it_s_a_bad_idea_to_enter_warren_buffett.2.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slate.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;sports&#x2F;sports_nut&#x2F;2014&#x2F;03&#x2F;bill...</a>
评论 #7417122 未加载
评论 #7417949 未加载
ajstilesabout 11 years ago
Silver&#x27;s round-by-round projection percentages are included in the HTML source. If you like building rule-specific points projections, here&#x27;s the data, extracted:<p><a href="https://gist.github.com/ajstiles/06e2ac52927d3f292255" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;ajstiles&#x2F;06e2ac52927d3f292255</a>
danvideoabout 11 years ago
I find the discussion of their model much more interesting than the results: <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/nate-silvers-ncaa-basketball-predictions/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fivethirtyeight.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;nate-silvers-ncaa-basket...</a>
TheBivabout 11 years ago
A #16 seed has never beaten a #1 seed in the history of the tournament, yet the percentages of moving on for #1 seeds against #16 seeds vary from 96%-99%.<p>I wonder if there would be any of this variance (4 percentage points from 100%) if computers, without human input, were used to place the likelihood of moving on.
评论 #7417240 未加载
评论 #7417020 未加载
hansyabout 11 years ago
Is this the first year Nate and his team have modeled the NCAA Tournament? I&#x27;d be curious to know if they applied a similar statistical approach last year and, if so, how that model faired against the actual tournament results.
bpm140about 11 years ago
Florida has a higher percentage of winning every round than Louisville, but Louisville has a higher overall chance of winning the tourney.<p>What am I missing?
评论 #7418576 未加载