Math doesn't check out for me: plane flies at ~700mph or 0.2 miles per second. Satellite speed is on the order of 5 miles per second. Sensors separation is on the order of a few inches. It would take about 15 microseconds between first and last sensor passing over the same spot. The plane can only move around 5 millimeters in this amount of time. It looks like it's moved several hundred feet.<p>What am I missing?
Since there shouldn't be too much moving around the open ocean besides planes, couldn't you use this artifact to build a semidecent search algorithim rather than going through all the data by hand?
Thus far, have we found even a single piece of debris that we know came from the MH370?<p>I just don't buy the idea that the plane ended up as far south as it did and I haven't really read of any solid evidence to support this other than one blurry satellite image with a large but unidentifiable object. If that object was in fact part of the plane, I have yet to hear of any explanation as to why the plane was that far south of it's last known position instead of continuing north west.
Out of all the news coverage showing the search crews manning the planes, never once did I see anyone wearing sunglasses. Wouldn't polarized glasses actually help with reflection/glare?