<p><pre><code> Delegation should be instant and dynamic. If I trust
somebody to make a decision on my behalf, I should be
able to delegate to them instantly. And if they lose
my trust, I should be able to take it away with the
same speed.
</code></pre>
It sounds nice until one considers certain conditions where emotion takes dangerous bias in collective decision making. Think: after a tragedy or during a war.<p>"Delegating" is the the lazy form of democracy. At least on the ethical and moral responsibility level. Discussion and action are the least lazy. I agree with the OP that other discussion platforms show how that can be done better. Influence of such platforms may come naturally as the zombie generation (read: TV) dies off and the participatory generation (read: Internet) becomes more commonplace. But they should definitely be encouraged.<p>To me the keyword comes from opinion modelling rather that direct decision and low-latency delegation. As we gauge and model opinion better this will increase citizen influence. ... I'm still not sure however if this is a good thing. In any case the OP's project looks to be an interesting project to build a system to foster such communication of opinion:<p><pre><code> https://www.loomio.org/
The world needs a better way to make decisions together.</code></pre>