TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

What every founder fears

160 pointsby mefabout 11 years ago

17 comments

debtabout 11 years ago
I&#x27;m sorry to offend but she is incredibly full of herself and quite immature. Like she&#x27;s on some sort of pulpit, spouting things she thinks people give a shit about. I mean, she <i>quotes</i> herself numerous times in this post. She indirectly hints how her lifestyle is so similar to other rich CEOs. Also, from what everyone else says, she seems to be begging her &quot;friends&quot; to donate to her charity as to validate or eclipse her husband&#x27;s success.<p>Honestly, this whole situation shows that all three of these people don&#x27;t know how to interact socially, like for real, with other people. I&#x27;m saying &quot;for real&quot; because it seems their social perspectives are heavily skewed inward and towards themselves.<p>Also, it&#x27;s super odd because towards the end of the post, the lines get blurred; she seems to be equating her husband&#x27;s success with her own. She had literally <i>zero</i> to do with the success of Github.
评论 #7625952 未加载
评论 #7625603 未加载
评论 #7626100 未加载
评论 #7627055 未加载
评论 #7630196 未加载
评论 #7626254 未加载
评论 #7626490 未加载
kohanzabout 11 years ago
<i>After weeks of silence, we learned that, despite, being found not guilty of the harassment accusations, questions popped up regarding Tom’s judgment in a separate area. We learned that unnamed employees felt pressured by Tom and me to work pro-bono for my nonprofit.</i><p>This appears to be the real reason for Tom&#x27;s resignation.
评论 #7624791 未加载
评论 #7624664 未加载
评论 #7625643 未加载
评论 #7625511 未加载
评论 #7624139 未加载
btreesOfSpringabout 11 years ago
I don&#x27;t know the personalities of anyone involved in this ordeal and that makes the whole thing difficult to judge. If this is a case of the workplace sociopath, I pity all involved. In my own experiences working with manipulative people, they typically find a narrative to support their abusive behaviors and when these people are called on for those actions, they either act surprised or hurt and often both. This person is hurt by being called things like &quot;naive&quot; because it is reflective of their own incompetence. Certainly &quot;optimistic&quot; is a better way of putting it because it means all of the &quot;good intentions&quot; were squandered by everyone else who just didn&#x27;t get it. The manipulator shouldn&#x27;t have to suffer the consequences, since it is his&#x2F;her trust that has been betrayed. You see, all along, the manipulator was trying to be the good guy. The one making the office better, &quot;more fun&quot;, it was always good intentions but the other people either misunderstood or just want to spoil it for the rest of us.<p>I sincerely hope no one has to work with this personality type but I am willing to bet most everyone has seen this bad faith behavior in action. You know the office bully who, when called out for pushing a person around says in some form, &quot;come on, can&#x27;t you take a joke?&quot; Isn&#x27;t it odd how this same person never calls the thing a joke when he or she gets what is wanted out of the same behavior?<p>&quot;I was totally joking when I said I needed you to work over the weekend or else. Seesch. Lighten up.&quot; I can assure you, I have never heard of a single person getting a monday apology email for putting in that weekend work from this sort of office &quot;practical joker.&quot;<p>So it is not too surprising to see HR departments and lawyers finding themselves implementing &quot;PC&quot; policies and &quot;buzz kill&quot; practices as a means of mitigating these sorts of power abusive strategies since the bully is ultimately going to act the victim of misunderstood intentions when asked in any form to stop.<p>Isn&#x27;t it odd how the biggest tragedy for this personality type is having to admit how their actions might have hurt others?
ballardabout 11 years ago
Richard Branson had&#x2F;has critics that accused him of all sorts of things. His advice, which is similar to Napoleon Hill&#x27;s, would be to demonstrate actions that are discordant to the accusations.<p>(The bigger of a celeb &#x2F; more successful you become, the bigger of a target you wear on your back for people to try to tear you down.)
评论 #7625951 未加载
评论 #7624562 未加载
bowlofpetuniasabout 11 years ago
<i>&quot;Naive, no. Optimistic, absolutely.&quot;</i><p>Neither. Arrogant it the right word. Not maliciously so, but arrogance nevertheless.<p>An arrogance that is far from unique in the start-up world, the arrogance to think that in spite of <i>centuries</i> of documented history you can create an organization that doesn&#x27;t have clear formal structure and not have it end up as a cult-like snake pit.<p>As companies, they fail to provide the kind of safety and security people who are not entrepreneurs need, and call it &quot;freedom&quot;. And it may feel like freedom for a while, when it&#x27;s still a small group of close friends, but after that it&#x27;s just a Darwinian social experiment.<p>And when the shit hits the fan, it doesn&#x27;t matter who exactly did what. It&#x27;s the arrogance and narcissism of the founders that is responsible. Founders who believe that everyone who works for them should be like them, and then everything will magically be good.<p><i>&quot;Tom saw himself not as CEO, but as the architect of a unique business structure. He wanted to create a company where he, himself, would have loved to have been an employee.&quot;</i><p>This isn&#x27;t visionary. This isn&#x27;t naivety. This isn&#x27;t optimism. It&#x27;s narcissism.
评论 #7627010 未加载
firstOrderabout 11 years ago
&gt; We learned that unnamed employees felt pressured by Tom and me to work pro-bono for my nonprofit. We racked our brains trying to understand this new allegation...I am so very sorry if anyone felt that I was pressuring him or her for advice, labor, or to sign up. I truly never had that intention...my idealistic belief in the status-free community of GitHub, I failed to recognize that power structures cannot ever be obscured entirely.<p>&gt; employees view them as disconnected and only trying to build empires of gold. Tom saw himself not as CEO, but as the architect of a unique business structure...He wanted to invest heavily in employees and to create a space that gave each employee the autonomy, tools, and support to build great things. In our home every night, he spoke passionately about how to build a company that gave employees freedom.<p>Other than being a Github user and customer, I know nothing of the details of this case other than what I&#x27;ve read. She admits she was obtuse about &quot;power structures&quot; in the company, but this also is not a unique thing in Silicon Valley - she&#x27;s not blind to these things in a unique way.<p>That said - it&#x27;s like someone believing their own press releases. &quot;A space that gave each employee the autonomy, tools, and support to build great things&quot;. To me that sounds like saying Platt from &quot;Twelve Years a Slave&quot; got an excellent bag to pick cotton from, and build up the glorious plantation he was working on. Preston-Warner can snap his fingers, and someone who was getting a check to put food on the table and a roof over their head is suddenly not going to have the rent check by the end of the month. Especially when the next employer is asking for references, why you left the last job, are there any gaps in employment etc. People on an H1-B visa are dependent upon the company so they can&#x27;t be thrown out of the country, so their green card application can not be restarted etc.<p>This is in the default structure of a corporation, and the laws, and all the default papers that super-angels and VC&#x27;s put forward. Ownership and control of a corporation is 80-90% in the hands of the angels, VC&#x27;s and founders. Of the scraps left over, executives and top-level experienced techs get the lion&#x27;s share. This is the reality, and everyone knows it. People believing their own press releases about people building great things are delusional. It&#x27;s like the Tuskeegee or Dr. Mengele subjects happy about how they are helping contribute to science. No one is fooled by this other than naive, new to the workplace, socially maladjusted programmers in their early 20&#x27;s. This is why there is such a feeding frenzy over this small pool of naive young men.
评论 #7624378 未加载
colinbartlettabout 11 years ago
I don&#x27;t understand why people in these situations feel compelled respond. Why defend yourself? Why say anything publicly at all? Curious if any PR-knowledgable folks around here know if there is any benefit to such statements.
评论 #7624648 未加载
评论 #7624033 未加载
评论 #7624482 未加载
评论 #7624163 未加载
评论 #7624046 未加载
评论 #7624125 未加载
gruntmaster9000about 11 years ago
&gt; I suspect that what founders really fear is being misunderstood in their motivations as their companies grow. They fear that employees view them as disconnected and only trying to build empires of gold.<p>These are the fears of a bad founder. Their job is to set the vision of the company. If the founder fears the employees feel they are disconnected, the founder probably <i>is</i> disconnected. If a founder should fear anything, they should fear not creating a safe environment where the employees can feel comfortable bringing their concerns to superiors — about any aspect of the company — instead of that self-centered fear of being “misunderstood”.
mathattackabout 11 years ago
The naive nature of this note is almost incredulous.<p><i>After weeks of silence, we learned that, despite, being found not guilty of the harassment accusations, questions popped up regarding Tom’s judgment in a separate area. We learned that unnamed employees felt pressured by Tom and me to work pro-bono for my nonprofit. We racked our brains trying to understand this new allegation. </i><p>Ummm... Perhaps it&#x27;s because you&#x27;re the CEO&#x27;s wife and you&#x27;re asking them to do something. It comes with the power.<p><i>I was the wife of the CEO, but that never entered my mind when I hung out with any GitHubbers.</i><p>Ummmm.... ok....<p><i>I have never known anyone like Tom. When I was interviewed by the 3rd party investigator, she abruptly asked if I thought Tom was naive. I was dumbfounded, unable to answer until she offered a different word; “Perhaps, you would call him optimistic?” Naive, no. Optimistic, absolutely.</i><p>ok, so at least it&#x27;s not her husband that was naive.<p>Apparently there are still threats of legal suits around all this fun too. <a href="http://news.easybranches.com/news/1844059.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.easybranches.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;1844059.html</a>
AznHisokaabout 11 years ago
<i>Yawns</i> In a few months, nobody will remember. I&#x27;m a HUGE Github fan, but the world doesn&#x27;t revolve around you, not even the tech world. We all live in a bubble here.
troelsabout 11 years ago
&quot;Sign in to continue&quot;<p>What is this, Quora? When did Medium start with that?
评论 #7626259 未加载
nppcabout 11 years ago
This is so NOT what every founder fears !
adnamabout 11 years ago
This is quite some schmaltz
vajorieabout 11 years ago
Hmm, so, not a single comment about how absolutely none of the issues raised by @nrrrdcore are addressed by neither github (whitewashing it all) nor these folk (one of which threatened everyone who questions him with a lawsuit). And none of the comments even mention @nrrrdcore or what she raised.<p>We seem to be witnessing the convenient limits of discourse.
Theodoresabout 11 years ago
It could be worse: it is not as if Github has a Hans Reiser on the books! Yet the way this story has been gone over you would think that something of that magnitude of catastrophivity had gone on.
trypabout 11 years ago
x
trypabout 11 years ago
#