A classic example of a page that completely doesn't need to be running under Meteor.<p>>Where are the Meteor.js users?<p>Probably sat somewhere in front of a 'loading' screen.
I used Meteor for 3 days. It was a nice experience at first because I was beginning web development. It wasn't long until I was annoyed by tha fact that Meteor hides so much from me. Picking my own components and putting them together was much better for learning how to write an app (which I'm still doing).
I used Meteor for a recent project, which was a multiplayer game served up on a mobile device via kiosk at a conference. It was the perfect tool for the job, and I enjoyed working within the environment alot.<p>So with my next project I was looking for any excuse I could find to use Meteor.js again. It is a portfolio-ish site with a rich admin interface. But I just couldn't live with the upfront load time and didn't want to inflict that on my client, no matter how nice the developer experience.
Well I was thinking of using Meteor, but apparently Australia and New Zealand aren't covered.<p>If the rest of Meteor's design is as bad as that map, then I guess that explains there's only a couple of hundred users.<p>I would say I'm insulted, but it'd be more accurate to say I'm shaking my head in bemusement at the idiocy.
Well, that took about thirty seconds to load. I know nothing about Meteor but this is not a good example of a web site, so I assume it isn't a great example of Meteor.js either. Does it have caching capabilities?