TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Show HN: Improve Your Writing – Grammar and Writing for Creators

23 pointsby richardofyorkalmost 11 years ago

6 comments

sloakalmost 11 years ago
The first bullet point reads &quot;Learn all the important elementary to advanced rules and errors.&quot;<p>How many of you had to re-read it at least once, or rescan mid-sentence, to understand?<p>I won&#x27;t even discuss the second bullet point: &quot;Write skilfully, and write powerful and eloquent blog posts, books, and more.&quot;<p>It&#x27;s quite disturbing to see this language in a guide that is all about grammar, writing, and the importance of being well-understood.<p>Or am I just a grump old man?
评论 #7866645 未加载
评论 #7867063 未加载
评论 #7866631 未加载
评论 #7866752 未加载
评论 #7866712 未加载
ztrataralmost 11 years ago
I dislike things like this. There are <i>tons</i> of FREE, valuable resources online about grammar and writing.<p>Why pay for this book? There is no reason. There isn&#x27;t anything special about writing for &quot;creators&quot; -- and if there is, this author hasn&#x27;t shown capability. Just look at the bullet points. They all end with a semi-colon. While that can be grammatically correct, there are many accepted versions here and a semi-colon won&#x27;t do anything but simply confuse most users.<p>Follow best practices from the big players&#x27; splash pages. This book looks unworthy of a reading even if it was free.
评论 #7866747 未加载
评论 #7866730 未加载
评论 #7866855 未加载
richardofyorkalmost 11 years ago
I am the author, and I will try to address some of the comments:<p>1. First, if you buy and read the book, your writing will definitely improve. You will write better than you ever have. I am confident you will. Those tiny grammar books on amazon.com wouldn&#x27;t help much because many don&#x27;t cover the crucial topics for writing well. I read nearly all of them.<p>2. Language is instinctual, so arguing about grammatical rules is pointless. Take this passage from my book: &quot;I agree with Steven Pinker, as he describes in his book &quot;The Language Instinct,&quot; that humans have an instinct to learn and use language, and some nonstandard grammars and dialects perceived to be unsophisticated and ungrammatical (Appalachian English Vernacular and Black English Vernacular, for example) do, in fact, follow sophisticated grammatical rules.<p>I will not hurl even a pebble of criticism to anyone who uses English grammar to his or her own inclination. Instead, this book helps people who want to improve their Standard American English and Standard British English grammar. By “standard,” I mean the form used in academia, mainstream businesses and books, and formal and informal writing aimed at the general public or educated readers.<p>3. For the first bullet, I combined two similar bullets into one, hence the possible oddity. I constructed it for brevity, not for eloquence. No need to niggle over a bullet; it&#x27;s a peccadillo. Incidentally, I wrote an entire chapter on how to write eloquent prose.<p>4. Ztratar, I presume you would agree that books are not useless. While anyone can probably learn anything online, books are still usually more organized and better researched than disparate articles and blog posts spread across hundreds of websites. In fact, to my knowledge, about half of the content in my book cannot be found online. I have devised some new grammatical constructions and techniques for writing skillfully.<p>5. Icambron, you should definitely read my book. You will learn a lot. For example, you will learn that all those things you pointed out are actually grammar myths (aka superstitions). I have an entire section on myths that many people believe are legitimate rules of grammar. Many such myths abound even in schools, including college. You should read the following article, a section from my book; you may find some of the cool sentence constructions quite different from the prosaic and formulaic constructions taught in schools: <a href="https://grammarandwritingforcreators.com/Creative_Powerful_Ways_to_Start_Sentences.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grammarandwritingforcreators.com&#x2F;Creative_Powerful_W...</a><p>5. Seanmcdirmid, I wrote an entire section on the rhythm and euphony of sentences, another topic rarely found in grammar books. You can read this new figure of speech that I have devised (unrelated to rhythm, but all the examples employ rhythm): <a href="https://grammarandwritingforcreators.com/Conceal_Reveal_Article_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grammarandwritingforcreators.com&#x2F;Conceal_Reveal_Arti...</a>
评论 #7867640 未加载
sgdesignalmost 11 years ago
By the way, Richard is also the guy behind JavaScript Is Sexy (<a href="http://javascriptissexy.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;javascriptissexy.com&#x2F;</a>), a great blog about JavaScript (I always recommend his &quot;How To Learn JavaScript Properly&quot; post: <a href="http://javascriptissexy.com/how-to-learn-javascript-properly/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;javascriptissexy.com&#x2F;how-to-learn-javascript-properly...</a> )
janderson77almost 11 years ago
Perhaps you are indeed a &quot;grump&quot; old man, as both those cited sentences are grammatical.
评论 #7866690 未加载
评论 #7866780 未加载
zachshallbetteralmost 11 years ago
This book was written by one of my favorite programmer bloggers. His blog javascriptissexy.com is sincerly a consistant reference for me. Don&#x27;t knock it until you&#x27;ve read it.