TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Of Two Minds – A neuroscientist balances science and faith

20 pointsby milkcirclealmost 11 years ago

7 comments

acct_0053almost 11 years ago
That&#x27;s nice. In a sense he&#x27;s rationalizing away the need to apply the same rigorous requirements to the existence of a god (and therefore whether or not obedience is necessary, followed by a source from which to gather his sense of morality) that one would apply to any other fantastical claim. So what? Nothing wrong with that. So long as he&#x27;s not applying that same mode of thinking to the actual science he does (which he apparently does not), doesn&#x27;t negatively impact others with that morality which he derives from his beliefs - or the source of those beliefs, and doesn&#x27;t demand that others respect or accept those beliefs. Doesn&#x27;t appear from the article that he&#x27;s guilty of any of those actions. Then again, I&#x27;m unfamiliar with his name or his work.<p>*Edit: rephrased &quot;...or acceptance of...&quot; =&gt; &quot;...or accept...&quot;
评论 #7973940 未加载
ciceroalmost 11 years ago
This is a great explanation of how faith and reason operate together. I have degrees in computer science and theology, so I don&#x27;t have the scientific cred of a neuroscientist, but I can say this piece does a good job of articulating my own experience.
评论 #7973519 未加载
altrego99almost 11 years ago
Admitted I didn&#x27;t think he would be sensible when he said he is a minority being &quot;serious Christian&quot; in a community of scientists, he turned out not to be sensible.
jabelkalmost 11 years ago
&quot;It hinges on a gut-level judgment about what sort of universe we inhabit.&quot;<p>The thing is, I don&#x27;t think a gut-level judgment is the best course of action here. Similarly, I don&#x27;t make gut-level judgments about whether I believe in gravity, or whether I believe in evolution. In my mind, the nature of the universe falls squarely under &quot;science.&quot;
评论 #7973626 未加载
评论 #7975495 未加载
n0rmalmost 11 years ago
This (short) book gives a sense of the &quot;faith&quot; required for scientists - <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13574594-ignorance" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;show&#x2F;13574594-ignorance</a>
taksintikalmost 11 years ago
I think &quot;faith&quot; is the operative word here. I don&#x27;t believe our &quot;religions&quot; are congruent with science. I have faith in science!
SNvD7vEJalmost 11 years ago
&quot;religious insights&quot; he says ...<p>&quot;religious delusion&quot; I&#x27;d say.<p>IMHO, thinking that science and religion would not be in conflict is just an even worse level of delusion.