I can understand it from a positive vetting approach, but now it is known about then if anything further data will be of questionable quality.<p>If anything I'm more surprised this is know about the NSA regarding this site more than the NSA's actions.<p>Though if you look at the linked source, viewers in 'US' OR 'GB' OR 'CA' OR 'AU' OR 'NZ' are excluded.<p>Now it does not appear that if you run thru a proxy service located in one of those countries, that you would by pass this flagging. Which is anything seems a little bit of a silly oversight and not one I would expect the NSA to be making.<p>So how trusted and true is this information and associated source this article is related too? Anybody add credence to this?