Sorry to reach back to the mid-aughts, but I found myself clicking through Wikipedia and landing on Steorn's entry:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn</a><p>What was up with that? Srsly. The Wikipedia entry is unsatisfying. Rational Me says, "Yes, they're obviously a fraud...and they found some gullible people to behoax" but Irrational Me says, "How can I get me some of that?" Interpretation of "How can I get me some of that?" left as an exercise for the reader.<p>tl;dr::someone pays a lot to get everyone excited about (another) free energy theory, hides proof behind paywall. Is this a viable model for the unscrupulous?