TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Amazon Tests ‘Kindle Unlimited,’ a Netflix for Ebooks and Audiobooks

65 pointsby jasonwilkalmost 11 years ago

11 comments

aylonsalmost 11 years ago
Scribd, after dabbling for a long time in the pdf sharing arena, has changed for a model just like this some time ago. One of the founders has even come here at HN recently to talk about it (I can&#x27;t find the post right now).<p>I wonder how will they react to this announcement. If they try to compete directly, not only will it be an uphill battle, but Amazon has a hell of firepower with the Kindle and Fire ecosystems.
评论 #8043513 未加载
edanmalmost 11 years ago
Yes! Yes! Yes!<p>If this happens, it will be my dream come true. Unlimited ebooks&#x2F;audiobooks is probably my #1 most requested &quot;feature&quot; from the world. Especially since Amazon allows syncing between audiobooks and ebooks, but I really hate paying for both.<p>Seriously, I&#x27;m such an Amazon fanboy :)<p>Interesting to see what the difference between publishing books online vs. publishing real book will be in 10 years.
评论 #8043793 未加载
评论 #8043883 未加载
higherpurposealmost 11 years ago
Some people seem to be missing the point about &quot;why Amazon would do this and &#x27;cannibalize&#x27; itself&quot;. Here&#x27;s why - yes, some people are going to pay the $10 a month, and read 5 books a month, and those will be like 1 percent of their e-book customers. The vast majority, if switched to this model, would pay $10 a month, and only read 2 books a year. The rest, will keep buying ebooks just like now, so nothing will change from that perspective.<p>I&#x27;m guessing Amazon has enough data to know that this will end up profitable for them. In a way, it&#x27;s just like Prime. Some probably order a ton of stuff every month, becoming unprofitable Prime members for Amazon, while others only a couple of year, yet still pay $99 a year for free shipping.<p>It&#x27;s only like any other &quot;unlimited&quot; deal out there. Some customers will be very unprofitable as they will take full advantage of the &quot;unlimited&quot; offer, but the vast majority of the customers will more than make up for it.
评论 #8043699 未加载
评论 #8043646 未加载
VikingCoderalmost 11 years ago
Many libraries have e-book borrowing, too.
评论 #8043470 未加载
评论 #8043792 未加载
评论 #8043469 未加载
__Jokeralmost 11 years ago
At least from the good reads I gather hardly people read more that 2 books per month. In a way $10 dollars is just the same thing, assuming $5 dollar is your average price of the book. If anything Amazon will profit from the all the users who read less but simply subscribe to it.<p>It feels like gym membership for books.
评论 #8043685 未加载
评论 #8044152 未加载
评论 #8043783 未加载
评论 #8043805 未加载
baddoxalmost 11 years ago
I&#x27;m guessing the ebooks will only be available on true Kindle devices. I just wanted to use the Prime Lending Library for the first time last week, and was disappointed that books can only be rented and viewed on Kindle devices, so my iPad and PC reader are out of luck. They don&#x27;t broadcast this fact very clearly either, since to me &quot;Kindle device&quot; implies any official Kindle client.
bluedevil2kalmost 11 years ago
Oyster already offers this (<a href="http://oysterbooks.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;oysterbooks.com</a>) - my wife loves it.
评论 #8043935 未加载
评论 #8043786 未加载
matthewbaueralmost 11 years ago
Amazon to launch Netflix for eBooks seems more accurate. They&#x27;re is no guarantee they have everything ready to launch it even this week.
ajbalmost 11 years ago
&#x27;Netflix for ebooks&#x27; doesn&#x27;t sound good if it means books that disappear out of availability like programs do on netflix.
评论 #8043931 未加载
egloveralmost 11 years ago
This might actually make audible worth the money which is way overpriced right now.
评论 #8044820 未加载
dangalmost 11 years ago
A dupe of <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8042451" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=8042451</a>.