Minor nitpick: X32 is not "32-bit x86", it's an entirely different ABI[1], using 32-bit pointers but the (faster) 64-bit instructions.<p>You're better of just calling it x86 to describe the 32-bit instruction set.<p>I love the connections between jumps and landing sites though, very helpful!<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI</a>
This looks nice. From the layout of some of the menus, it seems like it was written by fans of OllyDbg, maybe because OllyDbg still has no 64-bit support. OllyDbg is great, so hopefully I can get some use out of this tool as well.
Hey, great work! It's a little bit unfortunate it doesn't work for Linux, since I've been looking for something like that for a long time and haven't found one, yet.<p>How hard would it be to port this to Linux? What would need to be ported? I don't have much free time, but I might be able to contribute to a port for Linux, given enough free time.
This is based on the TitanEngine. <a href="http://www.reversinglabs.com/resources/open-source/titanengine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reversinglabs.com/resources/open-source/titanengi...</a><p>Is there a word for open source that has no revision history? (there's just a .rar file on that site). 7zip does it too and it drives me crazy.
It's really good to see such a lightweight interface, like Ollydbg. I stopped using Ollydbg back then when I had to debug some x64, but didn't find anything free with such a minimalist and powerful UI. I guess you guys made it, good job :)! I wish it was available for Mac too thought - not using Windows anymore.
For OSX there is now hopper, a binary debugger and reverse Engineering tool. Something between Olly and IDA with a nice interface. Can work on x86 as well as ARM binaries. Hopper is not open source.
<a href="http://www.hopperapp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hopperapp.com</a>
How does this compare to WinDBG, which already seems fairly mature? Why would I switch to this? (if you ask me, the problem of FOSS doesn't come into play here, since Windows itself is a closed platform).<p>And indeed, a similar GUI-based debugger for Linux would be awesome as well.
Hey look, it's GPLv3. So the only people using it are probably writing malware. I don't expect any commercial windows shops or anyone at MS will use this tool. That said, seems like a pretty cool project.