TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Apache considered harmful

2 pointsby jm3almost 11 years ago

1 comment

ncw33almost 11 years ago
I have to say, without knowing any people involved with Apache, hindering projects from moving to git for any reason is hard to fathom. Why _wouldn&#x27;t_ a new project use git? In the old days of subversion, anyone wanting to commit to a project had to send in patch files, and only the project&#x27;s maintainers were allowed the luxury of saving their work each day in a convenient fashion by committing it on a branch.<p>To the younger generation, not using git for a new project (or similar VCS) can look like you don&#x27;t want outsiders to contribute. If older bodies and projects don&#x27;t recognise that, they risk not getting patches sent in. The difference between forking and making a pull request, rather than working out how to format a patch file according the mailing list&#x27;s conventions, is the difference between becoming a contributor, or not bothering.