TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Open letter to the Linux World

20 pointsby etixalmost 11 years ago

1 comment

Karellenalmost 11 years ago
&quot;I had heard about systemd a few years back, when upstart and some other init replacements I can&#x27;t remember were showing up on the scene. And while it seemed mildly interesting, I was not in favor of using it, nor any of them for that matter. init was working just fine for me. init was simple and robust. While configuration had it&#x27;s distro-specific differences, it was often these differences that made one pick the distro to use in the first place, and to stay with that distro. The tools essentially <i>were</i> the distro. I just dist-upgraded to Jessie, and voila - PID 1 was suddenly systemd. What a clusterfuck. In a &#x27;One Linux&#x27; world, what would distros actually be? Deprecated. No longer relevant. Archaic shells of their once proud individualism. Basically, they&#x27;re now just a logo and a default desktop background image.&quot;<p>Really? That&#x27;s what you think the whole difference between the distros is, the fucking <i>init</i> system?<p>You&#x27;re using Debian, but you don&#x27;t think the Social Contract and DFSG are any part of what Debian uses to set itself apart? You&#x27;re just completely ignoring that, I can only presume on purpose? You don&#x27;t think that portage and USE flags distinguishes Gentoo from the other distros in any way? Or that Slackware&#x27;s deliberately ascetic package managment is at all important? Or that it&#x27;s unique directory layout and symlink farm is what makes GoboLinux awesome? The defining characteristic of all the these distros is what <i>init</i> system they use?<p>&quot;Debian has made a grave and cowardly mistake here, and they need a course correction immediately. Incorporating systemd was not an intelligent choice, and certainly not one very well considered.&quot;<p>Obviously, you aren&#x27;t aware of the debian-devel thread on the matter. &quot;Not [a choice] very well considered&quot; my arse.<p>&quot;Gnome. The Linux Foundation. freedesktop.org, and others. These are all groups with agendas. These are not those who believe in freedom.&quot;<p>And Debian too? All of these groups don&#x27;t believe in freedom? They&#x27;re just one huge cabal, none of whom believe in freedom, wanting to control you for... what end, exactly? Because it&#x27;s <i>beyond</i> the realm of possibility in your mind that they might have all independently come to the same conclusion, for the simple technical that systemd <i>might</i> actually be better than sysv-init?<p>Are you fucking kidding me?<p>For someone who started an open letter asking a question about the nature of intelligence, it certainly seems to this reader that the author is a long way from finding any answers at all in their quest...
评论 #8176295 未加载