TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Established company planning same thing as 1-man startup – please advise

26 pointsby matt_panaroalmost 11 years ago
I came up with the idea for matching up employers and potential employees based on common answers to user-submitted multiple choice questions: the idea is basically an online dating site, only for employment. I told my buddy about the idea and he pointed me to a WaPo article about how eHarmony is getting into this space, launching in December (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2014/08/08/eharmony-wants-to-match-you-with-the-perfect-boss/). At this point, I have an MVP (emphasis on 'minimum') prototype running at http://proqua.0xf1d0.net; but I'm not sure where to go next. One possibility is to try some sort of advertising campaign; another is to proceed directly to seeking capital (I have some personal money to play with, but not nearly enough to build a team and make a splash in a furious hurry). Unfortunately, I have no direct personal experience with either. If anybody has any suggestions for what a good next move would be, I'd appreciate it.

16 comments

dennybritzalmost 11 years ago
I have seen a lot of startups with the same concept, probably at least a dozen. So you are not alone. That being said, worrying about competition is silly. In fact, if one of your competitors gets traction you should see that as validation for your product, think about what you can &quot;copy&quot; and what you can improve upon. Just make sure you can tell the difference between what the press writes and what is actually going on behind the scenes.<p>The real question you should ask yourself is: How passionate are you about this product? Can you imagine spending the next 3 years working on this, giving it your full time and attention?<p>If yes, go ahead, keep on eye on competition, but don&#x27;t obsess about it. Keep hustling. There are many ways you can beat the &quot;bigger&quot; players. The best marketing is usually free. The saying that Microsoft was replaced by two guys in a garage doesn&#x27;t come from nothing. Also, it&#x27;s a big market with enough space for multiple players.<p>If you are not incredibly passionate about this industry and product you should probably stop right now. In this space, with lots of competition, you are probably not going to get huge traction (or money) from one day to another. It&#x27;s a marathon, and without the right motivation behind the product it&#x27;s difficult to keep it up. And most of your competition will die for this reason, not due to the lack of marketing dollars.<p>Edit: Also, a large part of marketing such a product goes towards changing the habits of job seekers. Initially, there will be a lot of resistance (or inertia). People are not used to your way of looking for jobs. You need to teach them. Competition will be immensely helpful with this. They educate your target audience for you. Once someone is actually willing to change their habits and try out a new way of looking for jobs (e.g. your competitor&#x27;s) it&#x27;s much easier for them to &quot;just switch to the better product&quot;, which is where you come in.<p>PS: I won a hackathon with the exact same idea once ;) But I didn&#x27;t keep working on it.
ntasoalmost 11 years ago
Before you pour in personal money, you should really think twice if you want to enter this market.<p>The employer-employee matching market is pretty fucked up in my opinion and personally, I wouldn&#x27;t touch it with a ten-foot pole. It feels horribly broken and I understand why so many people try to get into the market. There surely must be an easier way to match employees with employers than everything out there yet.<p>My main objections are:<p>- This is not a technical problem. Matching employees to employers <i>feels like an easy problem</i> but is incredible hard. Hence, there are assessment centers and headhunters. Do they work? Some articles pop up on HN every few weeks that suggest that they don&#x27;t.<p>- In my opinion, it is not even a problem. Top talent isn&#x27;t hired by match-making platforms. So you try to match average Joe with average jobs. For this job, a simple job description should be sufficient (and it is, mostly).<p>- Match-making platforms are easily game-able, because they&#x27;re only an intermediate step. The goal is to get a job interview, thus it&#x27;s better to game the system as an employee than to play by the rules<p>- &quot;My PHP skills are a 7 out of 10, you&#x27;re looking for at least an 8. Am I really a 7?&quot; -&gt; there&#x27;s no objective way to judge skills. It depends on the job and on the employer. Thus, the best solution is to put as many skills as possible with the highest points as possible.<p>- Try to think of this &quot;problem&quot; by comparing it to housing-platforms. You&#x27;re looking for a 2 bedroom appartment. It should be bright, not much noise, under 1000$. Surely, you can now filter search results, but a match is done in real life. There&#x27;s no way to tell if the appartment is really for you unless you&#x27;ve seen it with your own eyes and got a feeling. The same is true for jobs. There&#x27;s no way to tell if someone is a good fit without having human contact. For appartments, a simple appartment description is enough. Why would you try to apply sophisticated matching-algorithms to human beings?<p>The only way this might work is if you try to target a specific niche that you really know a lot about.
ricardobeatalmost 11 years ago
Recommended reading:<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/24/with-1-5m-from-adecco-path-to-wants-to-be-the-eharmony-for-jobs-in-silicon-valley-and-beyond/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;04&#x2F;24&#x2F;with-1-5m-from-adecco-path-...</a><p><a href="http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/16/path-to-shuts-down-after-losing-uphill-battle-to-improve-job-search/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;venturebeat.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;16&#x2F;path-to-shuts-down-after-l...</a><p><a href="http://seriousstartups.com/2013/07/18/jacksonville-startup-path-to-finds-path-to-startup-failure-shares-ways-avoid/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;seriousstartups.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;18&#x2F;jacksonville-startup-p...</a><p>It seems something beyond smart matching algorithms is needed to really make it in the job search&#x2F;recruiting space. Unless eHarmony has found such a breakthrough, they don&#x27;t have any advantage but sheer weight. As someone else mentioned, smaller == faster. I wouldn&#x27;t spend anything above what was already planned on marketing or whatever, you&#x27;ll certainly not win that race when they have a fuckton of money available.
chatmastaalmost 11 years ago
This is a two sided market, and many people see that as a challenge. However, one side of the market is unemployed people, who are generally desperate and willing to submit their resume just about anywhere. (Apologies if that sounds insensitive to anyone, but it&#x27;s true in the general case.)<p>Here&#x27;s your strategy, at a high level:<p>&gt; 1. Acquire as many employee leads as possible.<p>&gt; 2. Sell the leads to companies.<p>So your first step is acquiring employee leads. The easiest way to do this is to set up a google docs form, with the set of questions you want to ask employees. Include name, location, contact info, and resume.<p>Post on the employment section of craigslist in every city, every day. There are (&quot;blackhat&quot;) services that will do this for you, or you can setup your own system with proxies and automation. I guarantee you will get an absurd conversion percentage. Unemployed people will submit their resume almost anywhere.<p>In your CL post, be upfront about what you&#x27;re doing. Tell the employees that you are matching them to companies based on questions they answer. Feel free to lie about how many companies you have signed up. Say it&#x27;s something like 1000, which sounds like a lot and will convince them to give you their info, but also gives you plausible deniability when they don&#x27;t hear from any companies for a while.<p>Once you have a sufficient number of leads, it&#x27;s time to get the other side of the market. Pick some companies you want to sell customers to. Go through your spreadsheet, and answer questions how you think that company might answer them. Then, go to the company. Seriously... physically go there. If you can&#x27;t do that, send a first class fedex envelope with some really nice marketing materials. Explain to them what your service is, and tell them you have X employee leads who answered this set of questions. If they&#x27;re interested, they can pay you per lead or a percentage of salary for any hire.<p>Boom. Leads sold, money made.<p>Notice how you do not need to build out your product. You have everything you need right now. Maybe make a nice landing page for your Google docs form, but otherwise, you don&#x27;t need to do any coding. Get the leads, get the companies, then build out the product.<p>Move fast. You are not eHarmony. You don&#x27;t need to put out some polished product, and you don&#x27;t need to play by the rules. Hustle!
评论 #8187498 未加载
评论 #8187452 未加载
7Figures2Commasalmost 11 years ago
How did you plan to market and sell your service before you found out about potential competition? You should execute that plan without regard to what others are doing.<p>The biggest threat to your ability to get off the ground is not eHarmony. In your general market (services that connect job seekers and employers), there is <i>already</i> significant competition, so what one company does or doesn&#x27;t do will matter a whole lot less to you at this point than your willingness and ability to hit the pavement and sell what you have.<p>eHarmony is working with three Fortune 100 companies. There are 1000 Fortune 1000 companies. If you called each and every one of them, do you think you could get a few interested in working with you on a trial basis? The answer to this question will reveal more about your chances of success than a Washington Post article.
评论 #8187204 未加载
apinsteinalmost 11 years ago
Competition isn&#x27;t bad. Markets are huge, don&#x27;t let that part scare you.<p>However, two-sided market startups are very, very hard. Unless your business model works before having a liquid market form, you&#x27;re probably doomed. Especially as a 1-man startup, it just sounds crazy. The thing with 2-sided market business is that the more you succeed, the more you have to grow the business, and it&#x27;s usually not profitable at first.<p>Unless you&#x27;re willing to get external funding and be in it for the long-haul and be OK with a largely binary outcome in terms of success (complete failure or big success), this is the type of business scenario I&#x27;d advise against being the best place to apply your efforts.
goodwinkalmost 11 years ago
This is a good thing, not a bad thing. A market of one is a lonely place to be. It&#x27;s much better to have a large company creating the market and bearing the expense and then leaving niches open for you to fill.
walterbellalmost 11 years ago
Competition reduces marketing expenses and adds parameters for differentiation.
评论 #8186988 未加载
rl3almost 11 years ago
Generally speaking, large companies tend to suck at executing on anything but their core products. Other startups are a far greater threat, simply because they tend to move faster and with greater focus, usually with a much higher-quality product.<p>In this case though, I&#x27;d say the threat is about equal since eHarmony has a massive amount of users. Keep in mind that many startups looking to foster a two-sided market fail because they can&#x27;t reach the minimum threshold of initial growth required for their product to work as intended.
mangrishalmost 11 years ago
I am building a similar product for the same market and what everyone has told you on this thread is great advice. People thinking that there is a one size fits all solution to hiring methods usually go out of business (path.to work4pie etc). Big hitters entering the market validates what you are doing. We have a very specific proposition for a very specific group of people which we want to solve best. If you are really interested in this problem maybe we could talk more outside of HN.
benologistalmost 11 years ago
There&#x27;s lots of good things about this. They&#x27;re going to spend money educating the market about this kind of service but they&#x27;re never going to be a monopoly, they&#x27;ll have lots of competitors if the market is big enough, and someone else had a similar idea and thought it wasn&#x27;t horrible too.<p>You should launch and carry on with your existing plans, faster.
funkyyalmost 11 years ago
Only because Ask Jeeves was popular didnt meant for few folks to create Google. Facebook? Twitter?<p>Use others experience to avoid mistakes and use being one man army as advantage - you dont follow stiff corporate code. Why Google and Facebook have issues with creating new service that will rock the world? WHy they need to buy startups? Use this as advantage!
orionblastaralmost 11 years ago
Hire a lawyer, file IP for your code and invention, backdate it to the time you started and show the logs of your Git account as evidence.<p>Write the other company a C&amp;D letter, that references you IP.<p>You need two things when you first start out a lawyer to file IP and an accountant to figure out your money flow and forms.
vineetalmost 11 years ago
Established companies are notoriously bad at the pace at which they respond to users - so don&#x27;t worry about the fast that you have an established company entering the space.<p>The bigger challenge in my opinion is that this is a two sided market (and building such business is very hard).
matt_panaroalmost 11 years ago
Thanks a lot, everybody, for taking the time to read &amp; respond. I&#x27;m grateful for the advice &amp; encouragement.
matt_panaroalmost 11 years ago
Well, so far, the general consensus seems to be to carry on as initially planned.