TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

One hundred rules for NASA project managers (1995) [pdf]

188 pointsby tabletover 10 years ago

12 comments

double0jimb0over 10 years ago
Spent 5 years at one of NASA&#x27;s prime subcontractors, positions ranging from mechanical CAD jockey to assistant program director.<p>This &quot;guide&quot; was written by a gentleman in the last years of his 37 year career. I saw many similar guides&#x2F;reviews of programs that were way behind sched and over budget. All written by retiring&#x2F;recently retired upper management, they&#x27;d come in under a budget provided by some government oversight company or consulting group. They&#x27;d poke sticks into every group, come up with their assessment, then drop it on the active program director&#x27;s desk. The program director would assign actions, the gov&#x27;t oversight group could check off the box that it participated in &quot;program saving&quot; guidance, and 3 months later everyone forgets&#x2F;ignores the input.<p>I think this guide paints a clear picture of how inefficient and misguided gov&#x27;t run programs are for those that can stand to see it. The irony is so strong in the title, it&#x27;s verging on sad. It is hard to believe anything ground breaking or efficient was ever created by following a &quot;100 Rules&quot; guide.
评论 #8271696 未加载
评论 #8274096 未加载
thearn4over 10 years ago
I&#x27;ve been with the agency for 5 years. Rules 76 and 78 kind of made me laugh, since projects and centers stab each other in the back all the time. But I think similar dynamics exist in any sufficiently large organization. Mastery of internal politics eventually becomes one of the most highly valued skills you can have, if you stay on for the long haul.
评论 #8270477 未加载
评论 #8272414 未加载
评论 #8273884 未加载
评论 #8270238 未加载
bengali3over 10 years ago
Rule 96: &quot;Experience may be fine, but testing is better. Knowing something will work never takes the place of proving that it will.&quot;<p>my motto: &quot;It&#x27;s only as good as it has been tested to be&quot;<p>I&#x27;m constantly reminded of this, most recently when I noticed my local Fire Dept doing checks on their specialty (gas powered) chainsaw tool every tuesday around 7:45am as I drive by on my commute.
评论 #8271405 未加载
评论 #8270602 未加载
评论 #8270493 未加载
clutchskiover 10 years ago
&quot;Most international meetings are held in English. This is a foreign language to most participants such as Americans, Germans, Italians, etc.&quot;<p>Zing.
评论 #8270845 未加载
mcguireover 10 years ago
As the aeronautical engineer friend of mine says when you ask him why he&#x27;s writing web UI&#x27;s rather than building rockets, which is what he trained to do: &quot;Because this flies and that doesn&#x27;t.&quot;
ColinCochraneover 10 years ago
Rule 30: &quot;It is mainly the incompetent that don&#x27;t like to show off their work.&quot;
评论 #8270464 未加载
评论 #8270489 未加载
mturmonover 10 years ago
Number 56: &quot;The first sign of trouble comes from the schedule or the cost curve. Engineers are the last to know they are in trouble.&quot;
numlockedover 10 years ago
&quot;External reviews are scheduled at the worst possible time, therefore, keep an up-to-date set of business and technical data so that you can rapidly respond. Not having up-to-date data should be cause for dismissal.&quot;<p>If you read &#x27;external reviews&#x27; as &#x27;fundraising rounds&#x27;...then no disagreement there.
dredmorbiusover 10 years ago
People reading this strictly as an indictment of government work are utterly missing the point. My own career spans decades, large companies and small, old and new, and a few stints of government work as well.<p>The thing this reminds me most of all is a <i>very</i> time-worn copy of Arthur Bloch&#x27;s <i>Murphy&#x27;s Law: and other reasons things go ƃuoɹʍ</i>. You can find most them here: <a href="http://www.murphyslaws.net/edition.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.murphyslaws.net&#x2F;edition.htm</a><p>It was at a highway rest stop on one of the long Interstate routes favored by aerospace engineers in the late 1970s, and I still think I&#x27;ve learned more practical knowledge from it than just about any other book I&#x27;ve ever read, though realizing the import of some of the apparently humorous laws (many of which were actually said with all seriousness in their original expression) has taken a long time to register.<p>Rule 24 from the Nasa piece should register with many here:<p><i>One must pay close attention to workaholics - if they get going in the wrong direction, they can do a lot of damage in a short time. It is possible to overload them and cause premature burnout but hard to determine if the load is too much, since much of it is self generated. It is important to make sure such people take enough time off and that the workload does not exceed 1 1&#x2F;4 to 1 1&#x2F;2 times what is normal.</i><p>Another huge lesson, particularly for the younger people on HN, is that if you find yourself working at an organization in which the rules here are being consistently violated, <i>you are working at a sick organization and&#x2F;or have a grossly incompetent manager</i>.<p>I&#x27;ve had management all over the map. One of the best had a great deal of government (and military) experience. He wasn&#x27;t overtly technical (though he knew more than he let on), but saw when goals were and weren&#x27;t being met, and would ensure that resources were made available and barriers removed, often without asking. Two specific instances come to mind: I required additional systems permissions for a specific task, told him, he was on the phone to the responsible person and I had the privileges within ten minutes (I&#x27;ve worked at shops where this is a 24-48 hour, or longer, task). Where my workflow made heavy use of multiple terminals and screenspace, and secondary large monitors were a rarity, when one freed up it was on my desk the next day without my asking for it.<p>And when business conditions went south (there were a <i>lot</i> of people hit), our parting conversation was direct, to the point, and personal. What I <i>didn&#x27;t</i> have to deal with was weeks or months of anxiety leading up to that point.<p>The gig following that one, with a young manager in start-up space, was a polar opposite, and, at least from a management perspective, a strongly negative contrast (though not the worst I&#x27;ve had).
pyrocatover 10 years ago
Just reminds me of this <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvnr52Muwo8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wvnr52Muwo8</a>
samiryusfover 10 years ago
Coming with background in service company in oil field and I should say I benefited from reading this script a lot
fuddleover 10 years ago
&quot;Space is not a big playing field.&quot; - had me fooled.
评论 #8273082 未加载