TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Lecture 2: How to Start a Startup

362 pointsby gatsbyover 10 years ago

26 comments

malthausover 10 years ago
as someone geographically &amp; logically outside of the silicon valley bubble, working in the &#x27;real economy&#x27; and a bit older than the y combinator target group it hurts me to see those kind of lectures &#x2F; advice on startups.<p>from my perspective it all seems like one big circle jerk, especially considering the hive-mind mentality here on hackernews where working 80hours+ &#x2F; week for some fun app startup seems like good guidance for young people and something to strive for.<p>the goal of a startup is to make money, not raising money. the SV scene seems to be concentrating on the latter since its influenced &amp; guided completely by venture capitalists and their interests instead of market opportunities.<p>to be provocative: just throw thousands of teenagers at random things, give them some pocket money and hope something sticks. motivate them by giving them some grand illusion of being an independent entrepreuner. burnout is just something that comes with the game. give them lectures to clone them into perfect worker bees for VCs as traditional education would clone them into perfect big corp employees.<p>my advice to young people with drive is: go travel, see the world first. solve real problems. starting your typical SV startup is mostly an illusion and a bad proposition for you. young age is certainly good for coming up with disrupting ideas, but execution profits heavily from life experience - think of survivorship bias and don&#x27;t be fooled by the few success stories.
评论 #8372005 未加载
评论 #8372956 未加载
评论 #8371875 未加载
评论 #8371942 未加载
评论 #8372255 未加载
评论 #8371833 未加载
评论 #8372013 未加载
评论 #8372883 未加载
评论 #8373976 未加载
评论 #8373006 未加载
评论 #8372425 未加载
评论 #8372449 未加载
评论 #8373684 未加载
评论 #8372106 未加载
评论 #8372271 未加载
timrover 10 years ago
The advice about burnout isn&#x27;t so helpful.<p>Yes, perseverance is important (particularly for undergrads, who have probably never worked on a project with a time horizon longer than a semester), but you can&#x27;t fix burnout just by lowering your head and trudging forward like a packhorse.<p>I don&#x27;t know if there&#x27;s a single, quick fix for burnout, but taking a vacation is definitely a good idea -- even if it&#x27;s only a few days. And if you can&#x27;t take your mind off of what you&#x27;re doing for a few days, something else is wrong.<p>Usually when people say &quot;I can&#x27;t take a break&quot; they&#x27;re engaging in catastrophic thinking. If for some reason they <i>really can&#x27;t</i> take a break, it&#x27;s time to take a good, hard look at how you&#x27;re doing things, and see what it is that&#x27;s causing that situation. In my experience, the root to your burnout will often lie in an honest exploration of that question, alone.<p>It&#x27;s incredibly helpful to get an outside perspective on your situation when you feel this way -- this is what counseling is for. If you can&#x27;t afford that, talk honestly with a friend you can trust -- a <i>friend who has no personal interest in the outcome</i>. That&#x27;s critical. If you ask your co-founder what you should do, you have to realize that s&#x2F;he&#x27;ll be biased.
评论 #8370430 未加载
评论 #8370828 未加载
评论 #8370454 未加载
评论 #8371247 未加载
评论 #8373351 未加载
评论 #8370596 未加载
reduceover 10 years ago
Burnout:<p>Whatever you do, constantly be looking for ways to actively mitigate it. Just working less is NOT the only way to prevent it. Everyone has had times when they&#x27;ve worked long hours on something, and still felt great. Think about what was special in those situations. Ideas:<p>1) Play a sport.<p>2) Party hard, roughly 1 night per week, maybe Friday. This works well for many extremely hard working professionals in NYC. Not sure how well it would work in SV...<p>3) When coding, try to break up tasks into self-contained chunks that you can start and finish within one day. Accomplishing a new tangible goal each day can have a great mental effect. Catching up on big half-finished tasks from the previous day can be stressful and mentally draining.<p>4) Be around people you love being around. You&#x27;ll feel less stressed about escaping the office if the people you&#x27;re looking forward to being around are inside instead of outside the office.<p>5) Notice how it&#x27;s so hard to focus late into the evening at the office, but once you&#x27;re home you feel awake again and can work? For the earliest stage startup, consider making your work environment more like a home, or literally work out of your home with your cofounder. Your girlfriend&#x2F;boyfriend may look down at you for doing this, get used to it. Partners hate startups.<p>6) Go for walks twice per day, preferably outdoors, in a place where you&#x27;re surrounded by lots of people - or alone in nature, whatever you feel like you&#x27;re missing.<p>7) Kick out whining people, immediately.
评论 #8370857 未加载
评论 #8372456 未加载
lowglowover 10 years ago
I&#x27;m sorry, everyone in this god damn thread is stupid if you think there is a recipe for this shit. This is all part of the propaganda machine to make YC relevant.<p>This is just a warning. Down-vote me to heaven.
评论 #8371727 未加载
评论 #8371810 未加载
评论 #8371977 未加载
评论 #8371811 未加载
评论 #8372019 未加载
7Figures2Commasover 10 years ago
In response to a question about identifying fast-growing markets:<p>&quot;The good news about this is that this is one of the big advantages students have. You should just trust your instincts on this. Older people have to basically guess about the technologies...that young people are using. Because young people get older and become the dominant market. But you can just watch what you&#x27;re doing and what your friends are doing and you will almost certainly have better instincts on fast-growing markets than anybody older than you.&quot;<p>Vivek Wadhwa conducted a fairly large study[1] on successful technology company founders and discovered that the median age when they started their companies was close to 40. This seems to be in direct conflict with Altman&#x27;s statements, so I wonder what statistics he has to back them up.<p>Also, for all the talk about fast-growing markets and building huge companies, it&#x27;s somewhat useful to look at who is actually making money and how much. In 2009, just 3% of all taxpayers who earned $1 million or more were under the age of 35 and of those reporting more than $10 million in adjusted gross income, only 409 were under 35[2]. Since a significant percentage of million dollar-plus earners are self-employed business owners, a lot of old farts running businesses are doing something right even if, according to Sam Altman, they have a harder time spotting fast-growing markets.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-innovations/the-case-for-old-entrepreneurs/2011/12/02/gIQAulJ3KO_story.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;national&#x2F;on-innovations&#x2F;the-ca...</a><p>[2] <a href="http://taxfoundation.org/article/who-are-americas-millionaires" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;taxfoundation.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;who-are-americas-millionair...</a>
评论 #8370438 未加载
评论 #8370503 未加载
graycatover 10 years ago
One short remark: There was a lot of good in that lecture. But generally the theme is, that when have 2-3 founders and are growing to 10-15 people, the situation is, in just one word, <i>desperate</i>.<p>Let&#x27;s consider that: Yes, the subject is a startup that is intended to grow to be worth $1+ billion. The field is information technology.<p>Okay, but at 2-3 people up to 15, whatever the potential is, what is there is, in two words, still a <i>small business</i>.<p>Now, what can we say about starting and running a small business?<p>Well, the US, coast to coast, border to border, in cross roads and villages up to the largest cities, is just awash in small businesses. We know about many of them quite well, e.g., grass mowing (the guys that mow grass in my neighborhood arrive with about $70,000 in capital equipment and 3-4 people), pizza shops, Chinese carry out shops, red&#x2F;white checkered table cloth, red sauce Italian-American restaurants, auto body shops, auto repair shops, barber shops, kitchen remodeling, residential construction general contractors, suburban paving, masonry, a dental practice, a family medical practice, an independent insurance company, a SOHO law firm, a CPA accounting firm, and, actually, many more that are B2B and less well known, e.g., wholesale plumbing, manufacturer&#x27;s representative, electrical engineering, and more generally a huge range of <i>big truck&#x2F;little truck</i> businesses.<p>With this background, I come to the main<p>Point: Now these businesses are often sole proprietorships, file taxes as a Subchapter S, are not Delaware C corporations, do not have a board of directors, have no one with an MBA, and have never watched a lecture such as Altman&#x27;s. And, commonly they stay in business. And mostly there is usually no air of being <i>desperate</i>.<p>E.g., for one point of difference with Altman&#x27;s lecture, one bad hire does not kill the company. And hiring a good person does not take nearly as long as a year.<p>Okay, once a company has done well and grown to, say, 10-15 people, fine; if then the company has promise of growing to $1+ billion and many employees, terrific; then let the growth begin. But first step, make it through the stage of a <i>small business</i>, and that should not necessarily be wildly different from running, say, a pizza shop.<p>So, since I&#x27;m eager to learn, where is this little point wrong?
评论 #8372044 未加载
评论 #8370925 未加载
AndrewKemendoover 10 years ago
Enjoying seeing these lectures.<p>One thing sticks in my craw that Sam mentioned as common with these young founder startups:<p><i>&quot;Learning just a little bit of management skill, which first time CEO&#x27;s are terrible at goes a long way&quot;</i><p>Sam goes on to discuss how shit management is kind of par for the course in young startups.<p>It seems to me like getting this part wrong would be the death knell for any company and Sam went on to mention an example of someone who had multiple turnovers&#x2F;&quot;massive team churn.&quot;<p>As someone who has been a front line supervisor for almost 7 years these are absolutely basic fundamental day 1 skills that any manager should have, like giving credit and taking blame. Yet investors don&#x27;t give a shit about these types of things and basically assume they don&#x27;t matter - until they are causing problems.<p>I guess I just find it frustrating that teams with this management dynamic are getting serious money, especially with all we know about management.
评论 #8373381 未加载
zkirillover 10 years ago
Did anyone else feel sad when Sam skipped over two pages of notes? I hope we&#x27;ll get a chance to read them or hear them in a future lecture.
评论 #8370439 未加载
thuover 10 years ago
Why is it so bad to have a bad employee among the first employees ? I don&#x27;t understand why it is that bad because it seems that if he&#x2F;she is bad, you&#x27;ll notice quickly and then can just fire him&#x2F;her. Even here in Belgium where employee contracts protect more the employees than the company (at least that&#x27;s the theory), at the starting period, firing can be done very quickly and I think it can be done even more easily in the US.<p>Also I think the best way to see if someone&#x27;s good or bad is to put that person to work. This would e.g. mean that if you have filtered out candidates to 8 persons, you could get the one you prefer to work for 1 week. If your choice was bad, you try the second. In the worst case, you have made a very deep assessment of 8 candidates in two months. I mean that I don&#x27;t understand the point of recruitment processes that take weeks with all kind of proxy metrics for how a candidate would fit in a very small team.<p>If you can&#x27;t find out in a week that the person is bad, how can a recruitment process be better ?<p>Edit: I&#x27;m surprised by how the 1 (paid, in my mind) work week is perceived in the (so far) 3 answers below. It happens all the time to have phone interviews, HR interviews, technical interviews, possibly pseudo-psychological tests, and technical tests in a recruitment process. All that time without being paid (sometimes well before you know what the salary could be). It&#x27;s all about trade-off, I&#x27;m not talking about ditching the selection process and instead hire-and-fire liberally. My question was really just about why is it so damageable to get a bad hire.
评论 #8371653 未加载
评论 #8370493 未加载
评论 #8370480 未加载
评论 #8370478 未加载
startupfounderover 10 years ago
Lecture 2 Slide Deck PDF:<p><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/f1xgbo6c976di06/Lecture2.pdf?dl=0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dropbox.com&#x2F;s&#x2F;f1xgbo6c976di06&#x2F;Lecture2.pdf?dl=0</a>
staunchover 10 years ago
Now that the knowledge of how to start a high growth startup has become so well distributed it&#x27;s amazing how few seed deals Silicon Valley firms actually do. Even YC only invests in dozens of companies per year.<p>Only a tiny fraction of would-be founders actually attempt to jump through the hoops to raise money. Only a fraction of those succeed. And yet just about any team of hungry and determined tech workers has a chance at creating something of immense value in the world. Advances in technology have created many more opportunities than we can deal with.<p>A single VC firm could fund 10,000 teams at $100k&#x2F;each reasonably easily. Based on something as simple as LinkedIn profiles maybe.
评论 #8370712 未加载
评论 #8370466 未加载
rdlecler1over 10 years ago
Some comments on conferences.<p>When Sam talks about founders spending all of their time at conferences, I assume he means attending conferences rather than speaking&#x2F;moderating, because these have totally different dynamics. We have an investment marketplace for agriculture &amp; agtech (AgFunder) and so our success is measured by having thousands of investors rather than millions of users. For these kind of high-touch clients, speaking&#x2F;moderating at conferences is the best way we&#x27;ve found to source new deal flow, investors (our customers), and potential channel partners outside of having major media coverage. Our deal team gets crushed when I return from a run of back-to-back conferences. I could imagine it would be the same thing for enterprise sales and healthcare IT.<p>In cases like ours, if you can speak&#x2F;moderate at a conference you have the social proof to pitch to your customers horizontally rather than pitching up. Moreover, once you get one or two speaking&#x2F;moderating gigs under your belt it&#x27;s really easy to get more (Point to previous track record) as conference organizers are typically sourcing speakers&#x2F;moderators from previous conferences. I also watch for new conferences like a hawk, and fire off emails offering to speak&#x2F;moderate for anything that looks like it will have our audience. And the best thing about it is that you won&#x27;t have to pay. Final tip, if you have a content marketing channel (We created AgFunderNews.com) you can offer to promote the conference in exchange for some media placement of your own. Again, a big $$ saver.
howradicalover 10 years ago
Timestamped notes for lecture 2: <a href="https://timelined.com/how-to-start-a-startup/lecture-2-how-to-start-a-startup" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;timelined.com&#x2F;how-to-start-a-startup&#x2F;lecture-2-how-t...</a>
pptr1over 10 years ago
I understand the cynicism about YC and silicon valley. I think it&#x27;s great to have some critical thoughts about the why and how.<p>However these lectures are pretty good. I would highly recommend to watch them even if your skeptical about all things silicon valley. Some of the lessons and points of Lecture 2 about focus and intensity also apply to small businesses and large businesses as well.<p>I thought the ending quote from Henry Ford was great.<p>&quot;The competitor to be feared is one who never bothers about you at all, but goes on making his own business better all the time&quot;
philipDSover 10 years ago
Some notes I made. Might include minor errors or misinterpretation on my side.<p>-&gt; how do you identify markets that are growing quickly?<p><pre><code> trust your instincts students: watch what you&#x27;re doing or your friends are doing </code></pre> -&gt; how do you deal with burnout as a founder?<p><pre><code> it&#x27;s real life. you just have to get through it. canonical advice: go on a vacation. almost never works for a founder. you just keep going. you rely on people. you need a support network. address the challenges and things that are going wrong. </code></pre> 3. Team<p>A. Co-Founders<p>-&gt; Co-Founder relationships are among the most important in a company. #1 cause for early death: co-founder blowups.<p>-&gt; Choosing a co-founder is a very important decision<p>-&gt; Do not choose a random co-founder or someone who you&#x27;re not friends with.<p>-&gt; YC batch where 9 startups choose a random co-founder and all 9 fell apart<p>-&gt; A good way to meet a co-founder is in college. Next best thing is to work at an interesting company (e.g. Facebook&#x2F;Google)<p>-&gt; It&#x27;s better to have no co-founder than having a bad co-founder<p>-&gt; Top 20 most valuable YC companies: all have at least 2 co-founders<p>-&gt; &quot;Be relentlessly resourceful&quot; - look for this in potential co-founders. You need someone that behaves like James Bond. Smart, tough and calm<p>-&gt; You really want a technical co-founder<p>-&gt; Software companies should be started by software people. Not great non-technical managers.<p>-&gt; 2 or 3 co-founders is ideal<p>B. Try not to hire<p>-&gt; Try not to hire. It sucks to have a lot of employees (high burn-rate, complexity, tension, slow decision making, ...)<p>-&gt; Be proud of what you can do what a small number of employees<p>-&gt; In the early days, only hire when you desperately need to<p>C. Get the best people<p>-&gt; AirBnB spent 5 months hiring before they hired a person. Brian Chesky: &quot;Would you take the job if you had a medical diagnosis that says you only have a year left to live?&quot; - culture of extremely dedicated people<p>-&gt; Make sure everyone believes in your mission<p>-&gt; Pick a company that&#x27;s already working, but that not everyone has noticed yet. Breakout trajectory.<p>-&gt; Spend about 25% of your time hiring, once in hiring mode<p>-&gt; &quot;Mediocre engineers do not build great companies&quot;. A few bad hires can kill your startup<p>-&gt; Get person referrals to hire<p>-&gt; Look outside of the valley<p>-&gt; For most of the early hires, experience does not matter that much. Go for aptitude<p>-&gt; Are they smart, do they get things done, do I wanna spend a lot of time around them?<p>-&gt; Try to work together on a project, instead of doing a formal interview<p>-&gt; Care about projects and focus on references<p>-&gt; Look for good communication skills, manic determination, animal test and someone you&#x27;d feel comfortable reporting to if the roles were reversed (Mark Zuckerberg)<p>D. Keep the best people around<p>-&gt; Aim to give 10% of the company to the first 10 employees. Vested over 4 years. If they&#x27;re successful, they&#x27;ll increase the company by way more than that<p>-&gt; Fight with investors to reduce the amount of equity given. Be generous with employees<p>-&gt; Don&#x27;t tell your employees they&#x27;re fucking up every day, cause they will leave.<p>-&gt; Give your team all the credit for all the good stuff. Take responsibility for the bad stuff that happens.<p>-&gt; Daniel Pink: &quot;Autonomy, mastery and purpose&quot;<p>E. Fire Fast<p>-&gt; Fire fast. Everyone hopes that an employee will turn around.<p>-&gt; How do you balance firing people fast and making employees feel secure? Everyone will screw up once, twice or more. You should be very loving, not take it out on them. If someone is getting every decision wrong, that&#x27;s when you need to act. It&#x27;ll be painfully aware to everyone.<p>-&gt; When should co-founders decide on equity split? Not a discussion that gets easier with time. Set this very soon after you start working together.<p>-&gt; How do you know if someone is not going to scale up to a role if they&#x27;re inexperienced? Smart people almost always will find a role within the company.<p>-&gt; What happens when the relationship with your co-founder falls apart? Every co-founder (including yourself) has to have vesting. You pre-negotiate what happens when someone leaves. Normal is 4 years. Try to prevent dead weight.<p>-&gt; What about co-founders not working in the same location? Don&#x27;t do it. Skeptical about remote teams in general. Communication and speed outweigh everything else. Video-conferencing and calls don&#x27;t work that well.<p>4. Execution<p>-&gt; Being a founder means signing up for this years long grind on (good) execution. Everyone gets modeled after the founders. Work hard, be frugal, focus on customers, etc.<p>-&gt; Only executing well is what adds&#x2F;creates value<p>-&gt; 5 jobs for a CEO: Set the vision, Raise money, Evangelize, Hire and manage, Make sure the entire company executes<p>-&gt; 1. &quot;Can you figure out what to do?&quot; 2. &quot;Can you get it done?&quot;<p>-&gt; Focus. One of the hard things about being a founder: 100 important things to do every day. A lot of things that look important do not matter. Identify the two or three most important things and do these. Say no a lot (97 out of 100 times).<p>-&gt; Set overarching goals for the company. Everyone in the company should know these. These are the key goals. Repeat them. Put them up on the walls. Talk about them in meetings.<p>-&gt; Communicate. You can&#x27;t be focused without great communication.<p>-&gt; Meet every week. Focus on growth and momentum. Have to right metrics. Don&#x27;t let the company get distracted by other things. You can easily get excited by your own PR.<p>-&gt; Be in the same space with your co-founder.<p>-&gt; The secret to startup success is extreme focus and extreme dedication. Not the best choice for work&#x2F;life balance. Outwork your competitors<p>-&gt; Have a high execution speed. But be obsessed with quality at the same time. Focus on quality for everything you do (e.g. buying computers&#x2F;gear).<p>-&gt; Be biased towards action. &quot;I could do this great thing&quot;. Every time you talk to the best founders, they have done something new.<p>-&gt; Do huge things in small incremental pieces. There&#x27;s almost always a way to break complexity down into smaller projects.<p>-&gt; Be quick, do whatever it takes, show up a lot, don&#x27;t give up and be courageous.<p>-&gt; &quot;When I was running my own company, we felt we were about to lose a deal. Critical deal for first customer in the space. We called them saying we had a better project&#x2F;deal. We drove to the airport and showed up in person. We got to their office at 6am. They told us to go away. Junior guy wanted to meet. Then senior guy wanted to meet. Within a week, we had an agreement.&quot;<p>-&gt; Always keep momentum in growth. It&#x27;s the lifeblood of startups. You want your company to be winning all the time. A winning team feels good and keeps winning.<p>-&gt; If you lose momentum, most founders try to get it back in the wrong way (rally troops with speeches). You have to save the vision speeches for when you&#x27;re winning. Sales fixes everything in a startup. Figure out where you can get small wins.<p>-&gt; Fights will break out when losing momentum.<p>-&gt; When Facebook&#x27;s growth slowed down: Mark created a growth group. Small fixes got the curb pack up. Most prestigious group. One of Facebook&#x27;s best innovations that turned around the dynamic.<p>-&gt; Ship product, launch new features, review metrics and milestones<p>-&gt; Do not care about competitor noise in the press. Don&#x27;t worry about them at all until they&#x27;re beating you with a real shipped product.
评论 #8370623 未加载
评论 #8371536 未加载
adotjdotrover 10 years ago
This advice is honestly unappealing.<p>I genuinely expected to hear some new insights or information. Instead this is ALL re-purposed information. Nothing new here folks.<p>I certainly will not be listening anymore of these lectures. I&#x27;m very disappointed.
Fede_Vover 10 years ago
I found this lecture much more helpful than the first one - the first one had some good content, but seemed very generic without specific advice.<p>Here there was some incredibly useful, detailed advice, for example:<p>- Even for really complex projects, break them down into chunks - Don&#x27;t worry about PR&#x2F;marketing&#x2F;word of mouth - Management is an important skill and not easy for technical people<p>Those are maybe obvious no brainers for people with more start up experience, but from someone who is outside the bubble, there was a lot of very good stuff.
rock57over 10 years ago
Just in case, here is a fully annotated Lecture 2: Ideas, Products, Teams and Execution Part II <a href="http://tech.genius.com/Sam-altman-lecture-2-ideas-products-teams-and-execution-part-ii-annotated" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tech.genius.com&#x2F;Sam-altman-lecture-2-ideas-products-t...</a>
nxhover 10 years ago
What should I do if I think I am just a mediocre engineer? Just working for well established companies?
评论 #8375525 未加载
timtamboy63over 10 years ago
Notes: <a href="http://chintanparikh.github.io/blog/2014/09/25/how-to-start-a-startup-lecture-2-notes/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;chintanparikh.github.io&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2014&#x2F;09&#x2F;25&#x2F;how-to-start-...</a>
gatsbyover 10 years ago
&quot;Don&#x27;t lose momentum.&quot;<p>So glad Sam brought this up. Whether it&#x27;s selling, shipping, or hitting deadlines, it&#x27;s really difficult to keep moving fast if the energy is low and momentum slows.
bramggover 10 years ago
I&#x27;m loving these. How many lectures will there be in total?
评论 #8370381 未加载
评论 #8370383 未加载
stephengoodwinover 10 years ago
My favorite line from this lecture:<p>A major indicator for a successful startup is &quot;Every time you talk to them, they&#x27;ve gotten new things done.&quot;
lukasmover 10 years ago
Way better than the previous one. I really like the fact he has statistics. I wish YC would publish it.
smailiover 10 years ago
Does anyone know if non-Stanford students can drop in or is this for students only?
评论 #8370384 未加载
评论 #8370392 未加载
mustardgasover 10 years ago
Start up. Cash in. Sell out. Bro Down.