Name feels a little too close Konqueror to me. It's odd, nothing about this browser suggests an association with conkers, yet they've chosen this name which is very similar to an existing browser.
I consider Mooz's Keysnail Firefox add-on to be the most impressive keyboard oriented browsing tool. It's endlessly configurable, dotfiles in javascript--really nice to work with.<p>For Chrome, the Vimium extension is very good, but recently I've been having a lot of fun with a similar, more configurable alternative called chromium-vim.<p>Keysnail: <a href="https://github.com/mooz/keysnail/wiki" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mooz/keysnail/wiki</a>
Vimium: <a href="http://vimium.github.io/" rel="nofollow">http://vimium.github.io/</a>
chromium-vim: <a href="https://github.com/1995eaton/chromium-vim" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/1995eaton/chromium-vim</a>
What a strange keyset. It looks like part Emacs, part Vim, and part whatever the author thought was a good idea at the time. Some are quite intuitive (s to save link) and some are like wat (slash to view source).<p>As someone who really tried both Vimperator and Pentadactyl but eventually gave up and went back to mouse, this piques my interest.
I'm a very happy user. It's pretty well designed, and extensible in javascript. It's nice having EVERYTHING about the browser at your fingertips in fully customizable way, not just the the link-following mechanism. I use lots of vim hotkeys, just like I do in emacs.<p>Conkeror has sometimes struggled to keep up with xulrunner development, and there are sometimes bugs.
I was a dedicated conkeror user until ~4 years ago and loved it.
The webjumps were a pleasure to use, the Google I'm feeling lucky jump was a particular favorite. Having everything scriptable and being able to add my own specific functionality had great potential, I dug a bit but never really used the full power that I'm sure was available.<p>I started using conkeror after a shoulder injury that was being aggravated by mouse use, it was not particularly pleasant at the time but left me much more mouse-independent after I'd fully recovered.<p>I eventually left Conkeror because of a few hassles, I remember trying to set it as the default browser was not very simple, and just trying to get it (and XUL) installed and running would sometimes fail. This is a nice reminder though, I feel tempted to track down my old .conkerorrc and give it another roll.
Combining emacs' org-protocol and conkeror, when I'm on a github repo, I can easily type 'm-x clone-repo' in my browser, and make it send to emacs the url, and run any elisp function to clone the repo in my ~/projects directory.<p>Same for creating branches with standarized names when I'm on an issue page.<p>These kind of things make my daily browsing life easier. Here's a more detailed explanation: <a href="http://puntoblogspot.blogspot.com.es/2013/06/well-after-month-of-no-activity-in-this.html" rel="nofollow">http://puntoblogspot.blogspot.com.es/2013/06/well-after-mont...</a>
As an Emacs user, switching to Conkeror was great for me. It helped me consolidate muscle memory for the two applications I most use.<p>We have a nice little community on G+ as well: <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/106737437567911832239" rel="nofollow">https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/10673743756791183223...</a>
Unfortunately no screenshots and i don't like the default key bindings.
I have been using dwb ( <a href="http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/" rel="nofollow">http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/</a> ) for a while now and it's great! (Apart from some glitches on a few websites)
I'm disappointed that I can't C-x 3 to have web pages side-by-side, but I really, really like being able to switch between tabs with C-x b. I think I'll be giving this some time.
for those interested in a keyboard oriented webbrowser, check out <i>uzbl</i> [0] as well.<p>[0] <a href="http://www.uzbl.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.uzbl.org/</a>