I thought the question was more open-ended than just IDEs. Clearly there is consumer software designed to be addictive, and other software designed to create things which can empower a user to do more than they could without the software. Propietary vs. open-source isn't the issue so much as whether the core idea behind the software is to serve the user or to capture them.
You should really look into the works of Richard Stallman (RMS). He's done a lot of work into showing and promoting free software as it empowers, rather than restricts the user as proprietary software does.<p><a href="https://stallman.org/" rel="nofollow">https://stallman.org/</a>
Free and open-source software is empowering <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software</a>