TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

VP8 and H.264 to both become mandatory for WebRTC

147 pointsby kinetikover 10 years ago

12 comments

shmerlover 10 years ago
I hope Daala will put an end to this mess. But even though Opus is mandatory now, it didn&#x27;t yet translate into support by Apple and MS for instance for regular music and Web audio. Their historic sickening opposition to open codecs is not easy to dismantle. Apple still doesn&#x27;t even support FLAC, just because they like to make things messy for everyone.<p>By the way, what happened with Nokia&#x27;s attacks on VP8? Were they refuted by Google or they were validated by some courts?
评论 #8617213 未加载
评论 #8617686 未加载
评论 #8617779 未加载
评论 #8617219 未加载
rurounijonesover 10 years ago
&gt; “WebRTC-compatible” endpoints will be allowed to do either codec, both, or neither.<p>Neither?! What? How will that work then?
评论 #8616566 未加载
评论 #8616946 未加载
评论 #8616532 未加载
评论 #8616720 未加载
评论 #8616809 未加载
yuhongover 10 years ago
Hopefully this means MS is finally willing to support VP8 and hopefully WebM too.
评论 #8616948 未加载
asmicomover 10 years ago
I saw it long coming. We were butting head at the IETF 88 in Vancouver last year, and following the various correspondences on the mailing list, I knew we needed to make a compromise.<p>Good job!
MichaelGGover 10 years ago
Does this matter? Implementors can and will just do whatever they want for really critical things like this.
评论 #8616932 未加载
评论 #8616700 未加载
billconanover 10 years ago
I thought this is vp9&#x2F;h265 era already?
评论 #8616927 未加载
评论 #8619227 未加载
brunorsiniover 10 years ago
I don&#x27;t really agree with the author&#x27;s comment that this is &quot;an unmitigated win for users&quot;: if nothing else, hardware products might become more expensive because they will need native encoding&#x2F;decoding capability for each codec.
评论 #8616925 未加载
higherpurposeover 10 years ago
Only these two, or can others be used as well - such as Daala?
评论 #8616935 未加载
评论 #8616959 未加载
ck2over 10 years ago
The problem is the minimum level for WebRTC is so low, it makes H.264 useless for regular video decoding (like what you&#x27;d find on youtube).<p>So hopefully browsers implement more than the minimum.
评论 #8617787 未加载
fithisuxover 10 years ago
Why not VP9?
评论 #8617791 未加载
l33tbroover 10 years ago
I thought the licensing thing is not an issue if you switch to x264 (open source)? Better video also - smaller file size, less artifacts, doesn&#x27;t desaturate the image.
markjonsonover 10 years ago
Seems like a marketing recipe for disaster. <a href="http://www.easycabs.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.easycabs.com</a>