Original title: "Sephora discriminated against Asian customers, lawsuit claims"<p>Current HN title: "False positives are discrimination according to this lawsuit against Sephora"<p>This seems to be gratuitous and unsupported (by the article) editorializing. The article indicates that the lawsuit claims <i>only</i> blocking online accounts (causing loss of rewards points, etc.) of customers that had either Asian surnames or email addresses with Chinese domains. The lawsuit doesn't (from any information in the article) claim that false positives are discrimination.