A few years ago in the mid to late 2000s, Google was interested in bidding on over-air broadcast waves that were no longer being used by the government. The assumed motivation behind the bidding was Google's entrance into the data distribution industry to compete directly with cellular phone providers.<p>If private companies can purchase certain over-air broadcast waves, what's to stop a holding company owned by Netflix to purchase a channel and stream directly to each person's home.
Nothing, except that to recoup the spectacular costs of deploying OTA HD video broadcasting in each area they want to serve, the streams would need to be encrypted, and Netflix OTA users would require special hardware to decrypt them.<p>What you're essentially proposing is that Netflix should become DirecTV.
Nothing really, but to preserve the experience of Netflix, you'd have to have on premise equipment cache the broadcast (the actual content) and the library of films you can watch instantly will be limited to the storage of your device.<p>Because the bandwidth purchased by Netflix will be limited and they'll need to rebroadcast certain content (maybe people's boxes were turned off) they just won't be able to keep everybody's box in sync all the time. And will be a worse experience.<p>I just think it is economically unfeasible for Netflix to purchase enough bandwidth in enough markets to preserve the same customer experience. To say nothing of the technological, signal propagation and equipment manufacturing challenges.