TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ruby compiled with Clang is 8% faster than with GCC 4.9, 44% faster than GCC 4.7

67 pointsby gandalfarover 10 years ago

6 comments

iziettoover 10 years ago
Frankly I don't trust in "5% boost, 20% boost, 44% faster" claims without knowing how the benchmark was performed.
评论 #8742557 未加载
joevandykover 10 years ago
It would be neat to get a step-by-step list of what he did to compile this version of Ruby, what GC variables he used, etc.
评论 #8742374 未加载
评论 #8742502 未加载
mrinterwebover 10 years ago
I agree with most of the comments here that 44% faster sounds way too good to be true. Perhaps there is some micro-benchmark where this gain was perceived. A more through blog post to substantiate or disprove these performance gains would be welcome.
jbertover 10 years ago
It&#x27;d be really interesting to see the methodology used when gains like this are reported, because it&#x27;s potentially really interesting stuff but without knowing what was measured and changed, it&#x27;s hard to give it weight.<p>Which is a shame, because it&#x27;s probably really useful.<p>i.e. what&#x27;s the workload. what was the performance metric which improved. any detail you can give about the likely bottleneck of the system, etc.
krisdolover 10 years ago
What, exactly, is faster? Why does this have 50 points when there is no content?
longlivegnuover 10 years ago
&gt;ruby &gt;speed<p>ok.