TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Researchers have achieved wireless speeds of 1 Tb per second

59 pointsby ddispaltroabout 10 years ago

7 comments

paulsutterabout 10 years ago
TL&#x2F;DR: Simulating a low noise environment is lot easier than finding one in the real world. And that&#x27;s not news.<p>Researchers simulated a 1Tb&#x2F;s transfer rate within a 100Mhz channel. Shannon&#x27;s limit[1] explains how: set the noise term arbitrarily small, and your transfer rate can be arbitrarily large.<p>Bandwidth is popularly misunderstood to be some fixed range of spectrum, as if signals outside the range are attenuated to zero. But you can&#x27;t attenuate a signal to zero. &quot;Bandwidth&quot; is measured[2] as the range over which attenuation is less than (say) 3db.<p>If not for noise, you could utilize a limited-bandwidth channel as if it had infinite bandwidth merely by amplifying frequencies outside the range in the exact proportion they are attenuated.<p>But every real system has noise. Overcoming this noise is the challenge of high speed transfers. There&#x27;s no indication these &quot;researchers&quot; have accomplished anything whatsoever.<p>[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noisy-channel_coding_theorem" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Noisy-channel_coding_theorem</a><p>[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutoff_frequency" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cutoff_frequency</a>
评论 #9126327 未加载
jklontzabout 10 years ago
For reference, current DDR4 RAM to CPU is ~0.5 Tb&#x2F;s [0].<p>[0] <a href="http://ark.intel.com/products/81059/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-2697-v3-35M-Cache-2_60-GHz" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ark.intel.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;81059&#x2F;Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-...</a> (see &quot;Max Memory Bandwidth&quot;)
评论 #9125574 未加载
hristovabout 10 years ago
This does not mean much until we learn how much spectrum they used. We need more efficient use of spectrum not raw download speeds.
评论 #9125163 未加载
imaginenoreabout 10 years ago
2.56 Tb&#x2F;s in 2012: <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/wireless/twisted-light-leads-to-256-tbs-link" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;spectrum.ieee.org&#x2F;tech-talk&#x2F;telecom&#x2F;wireless&#x2F;twisted-...</a>
评论 #9125153 未加载
z3t4about 10 years ago
Wouldn&#x27;t there be a noise problem when all signals are broadcasted as in radio transmission!? Unless you point it like with a laser or microwave.<p>I would be hesitant putting a 1TB&#x2F;s uplink next to my head. :P
评论 #9125389 未加载
dustingetzabout 10 years ago
What could we do with this kind of bandwidth? I can&#x27;t even imagine.
评论 #9125743 未加载
DiabloD3about 10 years ago
This test is largely bunk. Its over 100 feet, in direct line of sight, using a client device that is a test device built exclusively for this (as in, it is not a phone nor a laptop nor anything small and underpowered like that).<p>They say &quot;5G speeds&quot; but neglect to tell you this is not done using LTE or Wimax (the only two protocols that ITU-R recognizes for 4G; 5G will use descendents of these as they are designed for many generation forwards and backwards compatibility in mind).
评论 #9125300 未加载