I run a food blogging platform and yesterday a blogger pointed out Google SERP showing recipes in context [1]. Technically recipes aren’t copyrightable but Google resorting to this will have a significant effect on search engine referral traffic. I think complaints will only end up in demoted ranking.<p>HNers, what can I do here?
For context, Here’s Matt Cutt’s question that led to an outrage [2]<p>[1] http://d.pr/i/13mGj<p>[2] https://twitter.com/danbarker/status/439125570115223552
Just taking a quick look it appears you need to add a description tag to tell Google what you want displayed in the SERP.<p><meta name="description" content="A description of the page" /><p><a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/79812?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/79812?hl=en</a><p>Just taking a quick look at your source code I don't see one (at least for the particular page in your screenshot).<p>If you don't provide a description Google pulls text from your page it things is most relevant or would be most useful to searches.<p>I would test out adding a description to that page and I expect that would be displayed in the SERP after a crawl/few days.<p>Hope that fixes your issue.<p>Nice ranking in the SERP by the way.
"Outrage." Uhh yeah, sure, ok.<p>Google have had rich snippets for years (at least 2011). You can manage them in WebMaster Tools if you don't want them for your properties. Here's some links:<p><a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645?hl=en</a><p><a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/173379?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/173379?hl=en</a><p><a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/99170?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/99170?hl=en</a><p>It is a little unfortunate that it is opt-out rather than opt-in, but unfortunately a lot of sites don't give SEO enough attention and as a result the functionality would rarely work.
> Technically recipes aren’t copyrightable<p>Per the US Copyright Office [0], that's true insofar as a "recipe" is a "mere listing of ingredients" (which is <i>not</i> what Google is showing), but not necessarily true beyond that.<p>[0] <a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl122.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl122.html</a>
> Technically recipes aren’t copyrightable but Google resorting to this will have a significant effect on search engine referral traffic. I think complaints will only end up in demoted ranking.<p>Not technically, actually. You can't copyright recipes. Your options are:<p>* Live with it<p>* Noindex and live with your site not being indexed by Google.
It sounds like you are getting rich snippets based upon your use of microdata as described by the following Google help page:<p><a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/173379?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/173379?hl=en</a>
Well, an extreme "solution" would be to noindex the site.<p>However, I noticed that your meta descriptions are really long. Maybe you should try to shorten them and hope that Google shows them instead.